The potential to end up deploying something that ends up being another asbestos-type "oops, we gave an entire generation cataracts and skin cancer" situation really concerns me. I'd want to see either some very long term research indicating that it didn't happen with far-UV light at all, or that the lights were in fixtures that somehow completely prevented the people below from being exposed.
UV Devices Could Keep Indoor Air Free of Viruses
71–72 of 72 posts
Re: UV Devices Could Keep Indoor Air Free of Viruses
#72When you talk to Indoor Air Quality (IAQ) most are uncomfortable with UV. Reason being that while you can get rid of viruses, you can also create volatile compounds. Our homes' air is like a soup of natural and synthetic chemicals. From your flooring wear to your decor off-gassing to cooking, there are elements in your air that may be safe as they are, but they can completely change when they hit something volatile l…
For those units, I don't think there's anything to be concerned about here, except the added cost of the UV lighting and what might happen if you (or a technician) were accidentally exposed to the UV lighting during maintenance of the equipment.
IMO, you're going to have to provide some extraordinary evidence if you want to claim UV health risks beyond these two factors.