Earlier quoted context omitted.
A human developer once told me that bad data is better than no data. So of course a human developer made an AI that makes bad data.
FWIW, the actual saying is that for the purposes of collection by enemies (like Facebook and Google or KGB and NSA), the only thing better than no data is bad data.
Demo of =GPT3() as a spreadsheet feature
71–80 of 149 posts
Re: Demo of =GPT3() as a spreadsheet feature
#72The ability of language models to do zero-shot tasks like this is cool and all, but there is no way you should actually be doing something like this on data you care about. Like think about how much compute is going into trying to autofill a handful of zip codes, and you're still getting a bunch of them wrong.
Yeah, I think energy efficiency considerations will become important at some point. Or at least they should.
Re: Demo of =GPT3() as a spreadsheet feature
#73The amount of 90% sensible, 10% ridiculously wrong computer generated crap we’re about to send into real humans’ brains makes my head spin. There’s truly an awful AI Winter ahead and it consists of spending a substantial amount of your best brain cycles on figuring out whether a real person wrote that thing to you (and it’s worth figuring out what they meant in case of some weird wording) or it was a computer generat…
Idea: Use GPT-3 to identify GPT-3-generated snippets.
Re: Demo of =GPT3() as a spreadsheet feature
#74From one of the replies: “This is awesome. I also love how 20% of the zip codes are wrong. Messy AI future seems really fun and chaotic.”
Re: Demo of =GPT3() as a spreadsheet feature
#75The amount of 90% sensible, 10% ridiculously wrong computer generated crap we’re about to send into real humans’ brains makes my head spin. There’s truly an awful AI Winter ahead and it consists of spending a substantial amount of your best brain cycles on figuring out whether a real person wrote that thing to you (and it’s worth figuring out what they meant in case of some weird wording) or it was a computer generat…
It depends on how people use the tools. For example the thank you note one -- if someone just prints off the output of this and sends it, yeah, that's bad. But if someone uses this to do 90% of the work and then just edits it to make it personal and sound like themselves, then it's just a great time saving tool. I mean, in this exact example, 70 years ago you'd have to hand address each thank you card by hand from sc…
I could extrapolate in my extremely judgmental way that the person who does that probably has a grandiose sense of how valuable their own time is, first of all, and secondly an impractical and sheepishly obedient devotion to big weddings with guest-lists longer than the list of people they actually give a shit about. Increase efficiency in your life further upstream, by inviting fewer people! (Yeah right, might as well tell them to save money by shopping less and taking fewer trips. Like that would ever work!)
But I digress, and anyway don't take any of that too seriously, as 20 years ago I was saying the same kinds of things about mobile phones... like "Who do you think you are, a surgeon, with that phone?" Notice it's inherently a scarcity-based viewpoint, based on the previous however-many years when mobile phones really were the province only of doctors and the like. Now they're everywhere... So, bottom line, I think the thank-you notes are a lousy use of the tech, but just like the trivial discretionary conversations I hear people having on their mobile phones now that they're ubiquitous, this WILL be used for thank-you notes!
Re: Demo of =GPT3() as a spreadsheet feature
#7651s -- "We are truly grateful", says the heartfelt thankyou card that was written by an algorithm in a spreadsheet.
Re: Demo of =GPT3() as a spreadsheet feature
#77Re: Demo of =GPT3() as a spreadsheet feature
#78The tasks on the first sheet is easily accomplished by flash fill in MS Excel and I suspect less prone to error. Not sure why flash fill is not more popular
Re: Demo of =GPT3() as a spreadsheet feature
#79The amount of 90% sensible, 10% ridiculously wrong computer generated crap we’re about to send into real humans’ brains makes my head spin. There’s truly an awful AI Winter ahead and it consists of spending a substantial amount of your best brain cycles on figuring out whether a real person wrote that thing to you (and it’s worth figuring out what they meant in case of some weird wording) or it was a computer generat…
Idea: Use GPT-3 to identify GPT-3-generated snippets.
Re: Demo of =GPT3() as a spreadsheet feature
#80The ability of language models to do zero-shot tasks like this is cool and all, but there is no way you should actually be doing something like this on data you care about. Like think about how much compute is going into trying to autofill a handful of zip codes, and you're still getting a bunch of them wrong.
Non-exact outputs are actually a feature and not a bug for other use cases - but this takes a bit of use to really see.