Live data from Hacker News

Nearly Half of San Franciscans Have Been Victims of Theft, New Poll Says

sfstandard.com

71–80 of 596 posts

Re: Nearly Half of San Franciscans Have Been Victims of Theft, New Poll Says

#71

A lot of unbelievable stats in this article. "only 12% of residents say that racism does not make solving problems more difficult." That's an odd finding to me. SF has always struck me as very progressive, but now I'm seeing that a large majority of the city thinks the city has a racism problem.

All those people suffering in some of the wealthiest space in your country and that is progressive.

See, here is the problem.

Re: Nearly Half of San Franciscans Have Been Victims of Theft, New Poll Says

#72
post #13

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That places better than SF exist and people are moving to them.

Why is everything “better” or “worse”. City vs. City. This is such a lame argument and only feeds whoever is seeking validation that they live in right place

I think your take is more outrageous: that things aren’t better or worse than other things?

Flint Michigan is really really bad. Their water is poisonous.

Similarly, crime is a thing that hurts ppl, in this case theft in SF.

How are we gonna sit around and pretend that some cities are not better than others?

Re: Nearly Half of San Franciscans Have Been Victims of Theft, New Poll Says

#73

I mean if a single package being stolen from your porch counts, then I'm surprised it isn't higher over five years . And porch pirates abound in suburbia too. The actual scary thefts are home breakins and muggings. I feel like the headline wants you to think it's those, when it's mostly stolen packages or something.

The headline made me think of car break-ins and stolen packages.

Re: Nearly Half of San Franciscans Have Been Victims of Theft, New Poll Says

#74

Quoted post unavailable.

This is more about a breakdown in the rule of law. The DA wasn't prosecuting and the police weren't arresting.

Blaming it on "inequality" feels like a cop out for the criminals. There are plenty of ways to get by in the world without resorting to theft. It's a lifestyle choice more than it's any significant source of income.

Stealing a loaf of bread to feed your family is one thing. Virtually all of the theft in SF is quite another.

Re: Nearly Half of San Franciscans Have Been Victims of Theft, New Poll Says

#76

A lot of unbelievable stats in this article. "only 12% of residents say that racism does not make solving problems more difficult." That's an odd finding to me. SF has always struck me as very progressive, but now I'm seeing that a large majority of the city thinks the city has a racism problem.

[deleted]

Re: Nearly Half of San Franciscans Have Been Victims of Theft, New Poll Says

#77

What is the rate for other big cities? Is this a lot higher than usual, or only a little higher? The thing is that people steal things everywhere. Bikes. Cigarette lighters. Money left out. Scam items off Amazon or eBay is a form of theft. Your beer at parties. Lawn gnomes. I don’t know many people anywhere who haven’t had something stolen from them at some point, so I’m not sure what this is saying

[deleted]

Re: Nearly Half of San Franciscans Have Been Victims of Theft, New Poll Says

#78
post #65

There's an important line that SF has not crossed (yet): murder still causes police response. In a decade or so, it will be like most large Latin American cities: murder will cause same lackluster police response as currently car break-ins do. Rich will have their own security, and poor will be afraid to walk after dark.

Sadly I worry this will be the case. Meanwhile all the “defund the police” politicians will have plenty of armed guards to protect them

Re: Nearly Half of San Franciscans Have Been Victims of Theft, New Poll Says

#79
post #34

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Baltimore? Tech jobs? Nice home? Don’t get me wrong, Baltimore has fun bars and Orioles games are fun..but I’ve never once heard anyone try to sell Baltimore as a great place for tech workers to live and work from

I've never heard Baltimore described as a place with a low crime rate! I guess it depends on what you're comparing it to. Just one recommendation. Don't move to Charleston. It's awful here, you'll hate it. ^^;

> It's awful here, you'll hate it. ^^;

It's no surprise that SF, Portland, and Seattle are the worst of the worst. Tech workers exasperate inequality and vote in virtue signalers (to be clear, I agree with the goals, I don't agree with deciding to do nothing about these problems). If you have a good spot, seriously, keep it secret

Re: Nearly Half of San Franciscans Have Been Victims of Theft, New Poll Says

#80
post #15

Earlier quoted context omitted.

“better place”. Where are you implying?

Just check states/cities where bay area residents are fleeing to, places like austin, dallas, raleigh, NoVa, Seattle, Denver, Miami, etc etc

>places like austin

Not a lot of difference.

https://www.neighborhoodscout.com/tx/austin/crime

https://www.neighborhoodscout.com/ca/san-francisco/crime

Post reply on HN