Live data from Hacker News

Guthib

guthib.com

71–80 of 137 posts

Re: Guthib

#71
post #50

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No it's not. EDIT: It is not NSFW. If you think this is NSFW, then I don't think you should be spending any time on the internet. The internet is not safe for you.

No it's not nsfw? Now I'm really confused, can I very paste this into slack #random or not?

Generally, it's considered best practice to not post "vaguely penis" content to official work communications channels.

Re: Guthib

#72

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No it's not. EDIT: It is not NSFW. If you think this is NSFW, then I don't think you should be spending any time on the internet. The internet is not safe for you.

It really depends on the degree to which your co-workers and clients lack a sense of humor. For example, in the early 00's I was working for a company that built a lot of CMS sites. One of the test images my co-worker used was Yoda driving a go-kart. A customer got offended, so we were instructed to use really boring images that just had the word "test" on them.

Some people are waiting to be offended. I used Mighty Boosh as a test image a couple of years back and was told off for it.

https://imgur.com/a/hOfmKpy

Re: Guthib

#73

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No it's not. EDIT: It is not NSFW. If you think this is NSFW, then I don't think you should be spending any time on the internet. The internet is not safe for you.

It really depends on the degree to which your co-workers and clients lack a sense of humor. For example, in the early 00's I was working for a company that built a lot of CMS sites. One of the test images my co-worker used was Yoda driving a go-kart. A customer got offended, so we were instructed to use really boring images that just had the word "test" on them.

What about Yoda driving a go-kart is even remotely offensive?!

A client being offended at something like that is a bit of a red flag for me...

Re: Guthib

#76

Doesn't have quite the style of http://pythong.org [NSFW] (Didn't think to mark it until people commented, and technically there's no nudity, but if you are looking at it and someone passes your desk they'll THINK there is nudity, and if you are actually at work I think that passes the bar.)

If for work your machine has installed Hubstaff or any of these hyper-invasive things that micromanagers love, then you can have the bad luck that a bad taste spicy pic get screenshot and shown in your user activity. But nobody ever should by any reason ever use these zero-privacy apps, right?

Re: Guthib

#77
post #34

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[nsfw]

No it's not. EDIT: It is not NSFW. If you think this is NSFW, then I don't think you should be spending any time on the internet. The internet is not safe for you.

You mean their boss.

Re: Guthib

#78
post #37

What's weird to me is that this seems like a totally implausible accidental misspelling, which just shows how differently people type, I guess. I can see that 'i' and 'u' are adjacent on the keyboard, but if you touch-type, they belong to different fingers, and I can't see how I'd transpose them while getting all the other letters right. If my right hand were shifted over by a key, I might get 'gutguv' or 'gotjim', I…

I'm sure dsylexia gets the best of many capable people when banging out URLs.

I suspect that there's also a rather large overlap in the Venn Diagram of "people who use Github regularly" and "people who are sufficiently mentally toasted as to regularly make implausible errors".

Re: Guthib

#79

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No it's not. EDIT: It is not NSFW. If you think this is NSFW, then I don't think you should be spending any time on the internet. The internet is not safe for you.

It really depends on the degree to which your co-workers and clients lack a sense of humor. For example, in the early 00's I was working for a company that built a lot of CMS sites. One of the test images my co-worker used was Yoda driving a go-kart. A customer got offended, so we were instructed to use really boring images that just had the word "test" on them.

I once got in trouble for using Bacon Ipsum as placeholder terms and conditions, since the client's project manager was vegan. I wish I was joking.

https://baconipsum.com/?paras=5&type=all-meat&start-with-lor...

Re: Guthib

#80

Doesn't have quite the style of http://pythong.org [NSFW] (Didn't think to mark it until people commented, and technically there's no nudity, but if you are looking at it and someone passes your desk they'll THINK there is nudity, and if you are actually at work I think that passes the bar.)

python with only c-string
Post reply on HN