Quoted post unavailable.
>Why do we suddenly have a problem now that it's advantageous? Something about judging someone based on the content of their character, and not color of their skin. I never really understood why we couldn't reach our societal goals by simply focusing on class, instead of race. A poor black American has much more in common with a poor white American, then with an affluent black American, especially as it pertains to a…
In Supreme Court brief, Yale and peers defend use of race in admissions
71–80 of 363 posts
Re: In Supreme Court brief, Yale and peers defend use of race in admissions
#72If your goal is equal opportunity you can look at socioeconomic class without considering race. Fundamentally the idea that race must be considered to achieve diversity is an inherently racist idea - you don't believe some races will get in without help.
Re: In Supreme Court brief, Yale and peers defend use of race in admissions
#73Earlier quoted context omitted.
Same reason we should have had a problem with it then. If racism is wrong, then it shouldn't matter which race.
Sure but this isn’t racism, it’s compensating for inequalities that are not fixable by “trying harder” or any individuals personal responsibility.
Re: In Supreme Court brief, Yale and peers defend use of race in admissions
#74Earlier quoted context omitted.
Eventually you have to stop using racism to "fix" racism.
I don’t think anyone disagrees. The question is just when.
Likewise what actually equality is is not thought about.
In other words people fighting this fight have no idea what winning it looks like.
Re: In Supreme Court brief, Yale and peers defend use of race in admissions
#75I don't like it either, but if they are going to be racist, just do what you need to do.
Re: In Supreme Court brief, Yale and peers defend use of race in admissions
#76Earlier quoted context omitted.
It is not racism, as for it to be racist it would have to support the idea that people of one race are inherently superior in some form or another to another race. Adjusting representation is not making any claim whatsoever about ability around members of any race, it's attempting to adjust for those kinds of claims that have already (falsely) been made. Nobody who is implementing these policies in any of these Ivy L…
Quoted post unavailable.
Re: In Supreme Court brief, Yale and peers defend use of race in admissions
#77I didn't realize college admissions' affirmative action had reached SCOTUS. I wonder what the outcome will be. Key summary: > "Today Yale joined peer institutions in stating emphatically that student diversity is essential to the missions of American universities and promotes educational excellence for all students,” President Peter Salovey said. “Our amicus curiae brief makes clear that the way we consider race and…
I think the goal of using race in admissions is more about giving disadvantaged people an advantage rather than increasing "diversity of thought".
Re: In Supreme Court brief, Yale and peers defend use of race in admissions
#78Earlier quoted context omitted.
The Ivy leagues today are anything but diverse in thought, this should be obvious. What actually exists is a repressive liberal orthodoxy, and no dissent is tolerated. I ought to expand on this since this comment will surely be controversial. I make no comment on which view is right or wrong; but suppose the conservative view were favored, and any disagreement with the ideology got your fired from your job, publicly…
This is pretty far removed from my direct experience with Ivy League alumni and professors (coauthors, colleagues, coworkers). It is a common refrain though. Elements of conservatism are sometimes viewed as being eschewed when they are ideologically based and the evidence doesn't support claims. But this is true generally and a consequence of the academic incentive structure where there are never enough resources to…
See https://www.econlib.org/archives/2015/03/the_prevalence_1.ht... for the shocking level of acceptance of Marxist ideas in the social sciences, despite a lack of anything resembling evidence for it. And a tremendous amount of evidence that attempts at implementing Marxism have done insane amounts of damage to the world.
Re: In Supreme Court brief, Yale and peers defend use of race in admissions
#79To quote from the brief. Unlike applicants whose identities have been affected mainly by their socioeconomic or geographic circumstances, applicants whose formative experiences relate to race or ethnicity would be denied the opportunity to convey their full, authentic selves when competing for admission to selective schools like Amici. And so we guarantee that millions of Americans will have a formative experience th…
Imagine coming from such a place to America, and seeing here women are wearing that symbol of oppression as a fashion statement. It just boggles the mind. Its analogous to if you were an American slave in 1800s, got your freedom and sailed to the UK. And on landing saw blacks in the UK wearing chains as a fashion accessory. It seems so disrespectful towards your struggle.
Re: In Supreme Court brief, Yale and peers defend use of race in admissions
#80I didn't realize college admissions' affirmative action had reached SCOTUS. I wonder what the outcome will be. Key summary: > "Today Yale joined peer institutions in stating emphatically that student diversity is essential to the missions of American universities and promotes educational excellence for all students,” President Peter Salovey said. “Our amicus curiae brief makes clear that the way we consider race and…
I think diverse racial representation is important, but is maybe better viewed as an indicator of success rather than a metric to optimize. Especially at a university, diversity of thought and academic talent should be the primary factors (imo).