I have a separate question regarding generics. I know a medication for a rare disease, which typically costs more than 6 figures, is having its patent expiring soon. I would love for generic drug makers (ones in India for example?) to come in and start making the drug for cheaper so it is more affordable for families. However, because it is a rare disease, I don't know if a drug maker would normally be incentivised t…
Medicare Could Have Saved $3.6B on Generic Drugs
71–80 of 86 posts
Re: Medicare Could Have Saved $3.6B on Generic Drugs
#72I was taking one prescription medication that cost $195/month if you paid full retail price. The two plans I was comparing had a $100/month difference in premiums. They were pretty similar in most ways, but the more expensive plan had full coverage for this medication (minus a $20/month copay), and the cheaper plan did not cover it at all.
This was a no-brainer, right? Obviously the more expensive plan would be the better deal.
Some years later I happened to join Kaiser, and their pharmacy page listed the actual cost of the medication: $23/month without insurance, not $195. And if I bought a 100 day supply the total copay for the three month+ refill was $30.
Out of curiosity I checked Blinkhealth and GoodRx, and yes, they each showed a total cost of about $23/month cash payment with no insurance.
Re: Medicare Could Have Saved $3.6B on Generic Drugs
#73Around 2010 I went freelance and was shopping for medical insurance. I'd been on Blue Shield from a previous employer plan and liked them, so I compared their plans. I was taking one prescription medication that cost $195/month if you paid full retail price. The two plans I was comparing had a $100/month difference in premiums. They were pretty similar in most ways, but the more expensive plan had full coverage for t…
Re: Medicare Could Have Saved $3.6B on Generic Drugs
#74Around 2010 I went freelance and was shopping for medical insurance. I'd been on Blue Shield from a previous employer plan and liked them, so I compared their plans. I was taking one prescription medication that cost $195/month if you paid full retail price. The two plans I was comparing had a $100/month difference in premiums. They were pretty similar in most ways, but the more expensive plan had full coverage for t…
what? how? how can they sell it for $195 then? pharmacy knows if you have insurance and then sells it to you for a more expensive pricetag?
One time when Blue Shield messed up on my premium payment and the pharmacy didn't think I had any coverage, I went ahead and paid the full $195 out of pocket to avoid delaying the refill.
That was what got me curious about checking the actual cost of what I was buying.
Here's how I feel about this:
"Nice prescription you've got there. Be a shame if anything happened to it."
Re: Medicare Could Have Saved $3.6B on Generic Drugs
#75Earlier quoted context omitted.
what? how? how can they sell it for $195 then? pharmacy knows if you have insurance and then sells it to you for a more expensive pricetag?
$195 was the retail price for the name brand drug. Even though my doctor had prescribed the generic (which I've taken for many years now - in fact I don't think I've ever taken the name brand), the pharmacies were charging the name brand price for the generic unless you had insurance. One time when Blue Shield messed up on my premium payment and the pharmacy didn't think I had any coverage, I went ahead and paid the…
nice. not nice.
and I think the same could happen in Europe as well.
Re: Medicare Could Have Saved $3.6B on Generic Drugs
#76The waste and high prices in the system is generated by pbms taking massive discounts from pharma (of which they keep a %) for brand drugs that shouldnt be covered or often even sold.
Cost plus pharmacy is vaporware - they are a website which applies a flat markup on top of third party pharmacies that will ship you the med. There are no special discounts, they literally aren't doing anything.
Re: Medicare Could Have Saved $3.6B on Generic Drugs
#77If you're angry about this, I can't imagine how angry you'll be when you find out our government sent 40 billion to pay Ukranian pensions from another illegal proxy war they helped start and have funded for the past eight years. The US government doesn't care about its citizenry and the two political parties play off one another to further enable their own agendas and further divide the citizenry. They are no differe…
That money will find its way to corporations, corrupt officials, warlords, weapons manufacturers. Very little of that money will be spent to actually help the average people there and ease their suffering.
Re: Medicare Could Have Saved $3.6B on Generic Drugs
#78If you're angry about this, I can't imagine how angry you'll be when you find out our government sent 40 billion to pay Ukranian pensions from another illegal proxy war they helped start and have funded for the past eight years. The US government doesn't care about its citizenry and the two political parties play off one another to further enable their own agendas and further divide the citizenry. They are no differe…
I wish I had your optimism and think that the money the US sends over is to "pay Ukrainian pensions". That money will find its way to corporations, corrupt officials, warlords, weapons manufacturers. Very little of that money will be spent to actually help the average people there and ease their suffering.
If folks new the whole story behind this war and the history of the region and US / NGO intervention in it, before throwing their support blindly behind a cause because their government and media told them to, I believe the sentiment around this war would be much different and no one would be cheering either side on in it.
It's just like Medicare and prescription drugs though - trusting citizens expect their government to enact policy that has their best interests at heart. Then they don't, and they turn around and vote for them again anyway. Then they'll wag the finger across the aisle and find some other virtuous cause to distract from the fact they're being screwed over by the very leaders they voted for, that turned around and lied to their faces. Military industrial complex, big pharma, our state-run media - It doesn't really matter what sector the federal government decides to get in bed with, people complain about it and then go right back to the polls to signal their willingness and intent to go through with another cycle of it all over again.