Earlier quoted context omitted.
Doubtful anyone thinks react is cool at this point. It’s more of a thing you just need to use for your job. It’s like Java at this point.
HN is a bubble of negativity. I see juniors light up when seeing react and trying it out for the first time. And I don’t know anyone irl who dreads react.
GitHub Star History Graph
71–79 of 79 posts
Re: GitHub Star History Graph
#72I am the maintainer of star-history.com. Thanks for posting this on HN. Just to share a trick, you can also use markdown to embed a live star history chart to your GitHub README. e.g. ## Star History [![Star History Chart]( https://api.star-history.com/svg?repos=bytebase/star-history... Instruction: https://star-history.com/#bytebase/star-history&Date Enjoy~
Re: GitHub Star History Graph
#73Re: GitHub Star History Graph
#74I am the maintainer of star-history.com. Thanks for posting this on HN. Just to share a trick, you can also use markdown to embed a live star history chart to your GitHub README. e.g. ## Star History [![Star History Chart]( https://api.star-history.com/svg?repos=bytebase/star-history... Instruction: https://star-history.com/#bytebase/star-history&Date Enjoy~
It looks really cool. A hand writing style... Do you plan adding new themes?
Re: GitHub Star History Graph
#75I am the maintainer of star-history.com. Thanks for posting this on HN. Just to share a trick, you can also use markdown to embed a live star history chart to your GitHub README. e.g. ## Star History [![Star History Chart]( https://api.star-history.com/svg?repos=bytebase/star-history... Instruction: https://star-history.com/#bytebase/star-history&Date Enjoy~
Is there a way to move or remove the legend. It's coming on the top of the curve for my project [1]. I am guessing there would be more projects with such a profile.
[1] https://github.com/amzn/computer-vision-basics-in-microsoft-...
Re: GitHub Star History Graph
#76Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Yet it seems to be a popularity contest people care about for some reason Before you incorporate someone's Github library into your own project, you want to know some things. Is it secure? Is it well-maintained? Is there an active userbase to help with support? Stars are one indicator of this.
Hardly. I was on a project with a JS dependency with 6.5k stars and sponsors but it injected a remote script at runtime without consent. I'm also a part of niche community circles where a project would be lucky to break 50 stars despite having phenomenal value and quality. It really is purely a popularity contest and only that with a bias towards other languages and projects that are equally as popular.
Re: GitHub Star History Graph
#77Slightly related, but... what is it with stars? I've never starred a repo and don't understand why I would want to. Yet it seems to be a popularity contest people care about for some reason, even though it correlates strongly with forks/issues/prs so you get the same idea about usage from those. Does it go at all beyond a "like", or am I just too old to get it?
Re: GitHub Star History Graph
#78For me, stars have an inverse correlation with actual usage. I'll star projects I want to look at some day, because they seem cool, like Svelte or Vite. But projects I work with daily, I don't need to star them to remember they exits, like React or Webpack.
Re: GitHub Star History Graph
#79Earlier quoted context omitted.
Doubtful anyone thinks react is cool at this point. It’s more of a thing you just need to use for your job. It’s like Java at this point.
HN is a bubble of negativity. I see juniors light up when seeing react and trying it out for the first time. And I don’t know anyone irl who dreads react.
There's not a lot of us, but we're definitely out here.