Live data from Hacker News

Milk alternatives produce up to 4.5x less greenhouse gas emissions as milk

ourworldindata.org

71–80 of 192 posts

Re: Milk alternatives produce up to 4.5x less greenhouse gas emissions as milk

#71

That's nice but it's not milk so ... apples to oranges. I'm not being unreasonable here, some people just won't give up real meat or milk, ever.

Saying you will never give up something regardless of the costs is the definition of being unreasonable

Re: Milk alternatives produce up to 4.5x less greenhouse gas emissions as milk

#72

I'm curious the long-term side effects on the body. I'm not sure it's better, we're something like 10,000 years into developing the ability to drink milk. I'm not sure we know what the effects of high soy intake is (only 10-15 years into mass consumer adoption -- we do see massive drops in sex hormones; possibly related, it is correlated). Also, I really dislike how these studies are conducted. They often don't accou…

Actually we haven't evolved to digest milk after childhood that well:

    While most infants can digest lactose, many people begin to develop lactose malabsorption—a reduced ability to digest lactose—after infancy. Experts estimate that about 68 percent of the world’s population has lactose malabsorption.1
    Lactose malabsorption is more common in some parts of the world than in others. In Africa and Asia, most people have lactose malabsorption. In some regions, such as northern Europe, many people carry a gene that allows them to digest lactose after infancy, and lactose malabsorption is less common.1,2 In the United States, about 36 percent of people have lactose malabsorption.1
    While lactose malabsorption causes lactose intolerance, not all people with lactose malabsorption have lactose intolerance.
https://www.niddk.nih.gov/health-information/digestive-disea...

Re: Milk alternatives produce up to 4.5x less greenhouse gas emissions as milk

#75

I'm curious the long-term side effects on the body. I'm not sure it's better, we're something like 10,000 years into developing the ability to drink milk. I'm not sure we know what the effects of high soy intake is (only 10-15 years into mass consumer adoption -- we do see massive drops in sex hormones; possibly related, it is correlated). Also, I really dislike how these studies are conducted. They often don't accou…

Soy milk hasn't been the favored alternative for a decade or more. Vegetable products are going to make more sense than adults breast-feeding from animals they don't even know.

Re: Milk alternatives produce up to 4.5x less greenhouse gas emissions as milk

#76

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There is a death spiral that can occur when demand for dairy milk declines below a level where the supply chain can no longer support itself economically. Milk consumption is down 40% from the 70s in the US, 2730 dairy farms went out of business between 2018 and 2020, and if I had to hazard a guess, younger folks are going to prefer non dairy alternatives (for a variety of reasons). https://www.theguardian.com/food/2…

Assuming there is still some demand, this would presumably open up opportunities for small local dairies, no?

At a premium price, yes. Depending on the macro, there’s always a low volume artisanal segment at a price point that covers costs.

Re: Milk alternatives produce up to 4.5x less greenhouse gas emissions as milk

#77

I'm not vegan or anything, but I've found oat milk not only tastes great on cereal etc, but it also keeps fresh for much longer in the fridge. I've pretty much given up buying cow's milk now days, unless I have a specific recipe or something that calls for it. Cheese, on the other hand, I can't see myself giving up any time soon!

When it comes to Oatly... It tastes good, but that's because it contains plenty of sugars. You'll notice the difference when you make your own oat milk from oats. It's tastes quite terrible actually. Oatly adds enzymes to break down the starches to sugar. https://www.gq.com/story/oatly-nutrition-ipo

Oatly original has 7g of sugar - 1 cup of whole cows milk has 12 g of sugar. So it is still significantly less sugar than cow's milk. I drink planet oat milk, and that only has 4g of sugar and tastes good to me.

Re: Milk alternatives produce up to 4.5x less greenhouse gas emissions as milk

#78
I didn't see it discussed in the article, but I'm very excited about possibilities like Perfect Day [1]. They provide "animal-free" milk. Unlike other alternatives, this product contains actual milk proteins derived from microflora. So it has more of the texture, taste, and nutritional content you expect from milk, but animals are not involved in the manufacturing.

I'd love to see how animal-free protein products stack up against these other alternatives. I think including it in the comparison may do something to assuage the "but it's not milk, so..." objections.

[1]: https://perfectday.com/

Re: Milk alternatives produce up to 4.5x less greenhouse gas emissions as milk

#79

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If it’s not arable then the cow’s food has to come from arable land somewhere else. You can’t just put a cow on a rock and expect it to produce milk.

Between land that gets enough rain for intensive cultivation without draining aquifers and land that's a barren desert there's a wide range and you can still graze cows on most of it, though it takes more land per cow in drier areas.

[deleted]

Re: Milk alternatives produce up to 4.5x less greenhouse gas emissions as milk

#80
Don't have the time to investigate the data, however, I have suspicion that they are neglecting the additional meat production from raising cattle.

Dairy is only a fraction of the overall cattle industry, and an even smaller part of supplying the protein needs of people necessary to live healthy lives.

Not only that, as per article:

> A liter of dairy milk is not comparable to a liter of plant-based milk in terms of its nutritional profile.

Post reply on HN