So, serious question because I know very little about OnlyFans other than the general knowledge flowing around the internet: What does this leave of the site? Because my impression was certainly that this was the purpose of the site.
On ThePornDude, there is a section called "free OnlyFans leaks sites", which is an excellent example of actual content.
OnlyFans to block sexually explicit videos starting in October
71–80 of 1001 posts
Re: OnlyFans to block sexually explicit videos starting in October
#72So, serious question because I know very little about OnlyFans other than the general knowledge flowing around the internet: What does this leave of the site? Because my impression was certainly that this was the purpose of the site.
That's my question, too - I thought OnlyFans was a hosting platform for personal porn sites; I remember there was a big uproar a few months back when some TikTok influencer joined the site and started posting non-adult content. People were upset that they were diluting a site that's specifically for adult content.
Re: OnlyFans to block sexually explicit videos starting in October
#73What is it called when your greed for investor money ends up giving a giant opening for your competitor and destroying your business? Also how come even the most profitable company can't compete with deep SV pockets? Is this capitalism?
State-backed capitalism has its faults, but they usually try to move billions into a strategically important area that benefits a large enough section of the economy.
Re: OnlyFans to block sexually explicit videos starting in October
#74Patreon made similar decisions about four years ago when they began to tighten their terms for NSFW creators. https://www.engadget.com/2017-10-27-patreon-adult-content-cr... Much of the pressure came from payment processing partners and banks, much like is described in this article. https://www.vice.com/en/article/vbqwwj/patreon-suspension-of... It seems like for any crowdsourced funding platform there is a volume ca…
I assume this will lead to Onlyfans's effective death, much as Tumblr's porn ban seems to have led to, or hastened, its death. Reddit seems to have resisted whatever calls it must be getting to eliminate porn. So far at least. It will ban or quarantine some heretical ideas, but porn is still there.
Re: OnlyFans to block sexually explicit videos starting in October
#75So, serious question because I know very little about OnlyFans other than the general knowledge flowing around the internet: What does this leave of the site? Because my impression was certainly that this was the purpose of the site.
Fairly good explanation of it being about far more than nudity. They have created a casino like experience for emotional interaction. https://youtu.be/ji5qepCx-8s
Re: OnlyFans to block sexually explicit videos starting in October
#76This split - and it's going to be a split (as they'd be insane to let that much porn money walk) is just to leave behind a nice investable onlyfans to rival patreon.
Re: OnlyFans to block sexually explicit videos starting in October
#77Re: OnlyFans to block sexually explicit videos starting in October
#78What is it called when your greed for investor money ends up giving a giant opening for your competitor and destroying your business? Also how come even the most profitable company can't compete with deep SV pockets? Is this capitalism?
Re: OnlyFans to block sexually explicit videos starting in October
#79Are there any major non-porn OnlyFans creators? I’ve never seen it referenced outside of adult content.
A lot of OF creators only do nudes and nothing sexual.
I personally know models making 6 figures and they don't even do nudes on OF.
Re: OnlyFans to block sexually explicit videos starting in October
#80So, serious question because I know very little about OnlyFans other than the general knowledge flowing around the internet: What does this leave of the site? Because my impression was certainly that this was the purpose of the site.
There's cooking videos, yoga, gardening and other benign stuff on OF, believe it or not.