Live data from Hacker News

Immediate skin-to-skin contact with unstable newborns improves survival chances

medlifestyle.news

71–80 of 236 posts

Re: Immediate skin-to-skin contact with unstable newborns improves survival chances

#71

Interesting to read this here. When my son was born (naturally, normal weight, fully healthy, and around expected due date), the midwife in Denmark had educated us about the Danish way of handling the birth - as soon as the baby comes out, they literally put the baby on mom’s chest, and leave us(parents, and baby) alone in the room for about an hour. Nothing needs to be done other than the baby being in care of it’s…

Here in America, we have GoFundMe.

Re: Immediate skin-to-skin contact with unstable newborns improves survival chances

#72
post #60

Interesting to read this here. When my son was born (naturally, normal weight, fully healthy, and around expected due date), the midwife in Denmark had educated us about the Danish way of handling the birth - as soon as the baby comes out, they literally put the baby on mom’s chest, and leave us(parents, and baby) alone in the room for about an hour. Nothing needs to be done other than the baby being in care of it’s…

I had a similar experience in the US with a large private healthcare provider at a large regional hospital. They did some quick health checks but then quickly left the baby with my wife and I for skin-to-skin time. This was planned ahead of time and encouraged by the nurses and doctors. I’m not sure if it’s become commonplace across the country but our care was impeccable and the nurses and doctors were happy to reco…

I've heard / overheard from multiple women from multiple states that birthing has changed and the baby is put on mom as immediately as possible, to the point it seemed odd from my experience 20 years ago. Doctors in the states have read all this too and things have changed.

Re: Immediate skin-to-skin contact with unstable newborns improves survival chances

#73

Interesting to read this here. When my son was born (naturally, normal weight, fully healthy, and around expected due date), the midwife in Denmark had educated us about the Danish way of handling the birth - as soon as the baby comes out, they literally put the baby on mom’s chest, and leave us(parents, and baby) alone in the room for about an hour. Nothing needs to be done other than the baby being in care of it’s…

This is the experience we had 8 and 10 years ago, and I live in the US. I'm sure some people have had bad experiences, but there are exceptions to every rule.

Re: Immediate skin-to-skin contact with unstable newborns improves survival chances

#74
post #70

Interesting to read this here. When my son was born (naturally, normal weight, fully healthy, and around expected due date), the midwife in Denmark had educated us about the Danish way of handling the birth - as soon as the baby comes out, they literally put the baby on mom’s chest, and leave us(parents, and baby) alone in the room for about an hour. Nothing needs to be done other than the baby being in care of it’s…

This sounds exactly like the process my wife and I are going through in the US right now. I’ve never heard of pregnancy being treated like an “illness” (??). Midwives are also extremely common here. Granted I live in Arizona, and I know much of HN lives in SF. So maybe this is unique to Arizona in some way?

Except for the bills part

Re: Immediate skin-to-skin contact with unstable newborns improves survival chances

#75
post #2

Based on this, expect US hospital prices for that service to go up.

Do you have to pay to hold your newborn in the US? Land of the free indeed

Could we put aside the politics? Jeez.

Re: Immediate skin-to-skin contact with unstable newborns improves survival chances

#76

I'm sceptical of single study medical research and especially that which involves the crazily political world of birth. It might be better to wait until the Cochrane collaboration does a meta analysis on multiple studies before anyone changes what they are currently doing.

The conclusion may be 'keeping baby warm' increases the survival rate. I agree with you, these researches are too vague, there are so many parameters, correlation maybe.

Re: Immediate skin-to-skin contact with unstable newborns improves survival chances

#77

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You pay for a nurse or aide to be ready to intervene if there’s an issue in a post-caesarean situation. In our case, the hospital my wife delivered in pushed skin to skin heavily, but after a minute or two, I ended up holding our son, skin to skin for the next 10-15 minutes becuase their policy didn’t allow mom to hold the baby while they sutured and did their thing. Once they were done in the OR, back to mom. Usuall…

> You pay for a nurse or aide to be ready to intervene if there’s an issue in a post-caesarean situation. We had a pediatrician in the room (which is also a perfectly opportunistic for the ob/gyn to score a referral). OR theater was main OB/GYN (which we chose), his assistant (also ob/gyn, younger and oddly published), anesthesiologist, instruments clerk and pediatrician. I don't think we had a nurse at all.

>We had a pediatrician in the room (which is also a perfectly opportunistic for the ob/gyn to score a referral)

Can you clarify what you are implying here? Kickbacks or other financial incentives are generally pretty illegal.

Re: Immediate skin-to-skin contact with unstable newborns improves survival chances

#78

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Do you have to pay to hold your newborn in the US? Land of the free indeed

Wait, you have to pay to have a baby in the US? The wealthiest country in the world cannot even pay for the birth of its own citizens? I can understand arguments for private healthcare etc....but making people pay to give birth is insane.

Tell me where it is completely free. And I don't mean paid for via taxes.

Re: Immediate skin-to-skin contact with unstable newborns improves survival chances

#79
post #70

Interesting to read this here. When my son was born (naturally, normal weight, fully healthy, and around expected due date), the midwife in Denmark had educated us about the Danish way of handling the birth - as soon as the baby comes out, they literally put the baby on mom’s chest, and leave us(parents, and baby) alone in the room for about an hour. Nothing needs to be done other than the baby being in care of it’s…

This sounds exactly like the process my wife and I are going through in the US right now. I’ve never heard of pregnancy being treated like an “illness” (??). Midwives are also extremely common here. Granted I live in Arizona, and I know much of HN lives in SF. So maybe this is unique to Arizona in some way?

My first kid in 2008 in Chicago wasn't like this, my second in 2012 in Portland was. I'd say America is adopting the approach; maybe it fully has by now.
Post reply on HN