Live data from Hacker News

Pfizer vaccine reprograms innate immune responses

news-medical.net

71–75 of 75 posts

Re: Pfizer vaccine reprograms innate immune responses

#71
post #64

"This also suggests a shift towards increased inflammatory responses to fungi following vaccination, say the researchers." Isn't that a good thing?

AFAIK no, since fungal infections are often treated with steroids/cortisone to lessen the inflammation.

Re: Pfizer vaccine reprograms innate immune responses

#72

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>Actually, vaccinating all kids is normal Vaccinating children with 20-100 year old (~1-4 generations of human feedback/testing) vaccines is normal, vaccinating them with 1 year old experimental vaccines is not. In my opinion, people in high risk groups (elderly/preexisting conditions) should take the vaccine, but low risk healthy individuals should wait as long as possible for more feedback about the potential downs…

What is high risk and what is low risk? We have about as much information about the effects of the vaccines now as we have about the effects of Covid-19, and they are generally better in each age group. (this includes the blood clotting that has been attributed to the vaccines; the incidence is higher in people that have been infected)

>What is high risk and what is low risk?

At high risk are the elderly (65+ years old), the obese, and people of any age that are diabetic and/or have preexisting cardiovascular issues (which accounts for the majority of covid deaths). I also include people that have excessive and unavoidable human contact with 100± people as part of their daily lives/work (nurses, teachers, customer-facing service workers, etc).

At low risk are all healthy people under 40, especially healthy children. They have the capacity to fight these viruses and develop antibodies the old fashioned way without intervention.

The low risk don't necessarily have to avoid the vaccines completely but would be better served with an additional 2-5± years of vaccine testing before taking the plunge. In the meantime, the low risk should prioritize exercise, eating well, avoiding immunosuppressive drugs (hard street drugs, antibiotics, etc) and buying as much time as possible by avoiding high risk behaviors.

I believe this approach drastically reduces iatrogenesis (disease brought on by the healer), which is a leading cause of death in most developed countries.

Re: Pfizer vaccine reprograms innate immune responses

#73

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>Actually, vaccinating all kids is normal Vaccinating children with 20-100 year old (~1-4 generations of human feedback/testing) vaccines is normal, vaccinating them with 1 year old experimental vaccines is not. In my opinion, people in high risk groups (elderly/preexisting conditions) should take the vaccine, but low risk healthy individuals should wait as long as possible for more feedback about the potential downs…

You guys are brave posting this kind of thinking here, but you do have support for presenting this view.

I appreciate your support. I've noticed my favorite science-related publications (ArsTechnica was especially surprising) completely suppressing and deleting these kinds of discussions in the comment sections.

Unfortunately this topic has been heavily politicized and dissenting opinions are no longer seen through a science-based lens.

As a person that generally dislikes both political parties, I get hit from both sides.... for being pro-mask/pro-temporary-lockdown (attacked from the right) and for being vaccine-cautious/anti-vaccine-passports (attacked from the left).

Re: Pfizer vaccine reprograms innate immune responses

#74

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What is high risk and what is low risk? We have about as much information about the effects of the vaccines now as we have about the effects of Covid-19, and they are generally better in each age group. (this includes the blood clotting that has been attributed to the vaccines; the incidence is higher in people that have been infected)

>What is high risk and what is low risk? At high risk are the elderly (65+ years old), the obese, and people of any age that are diabetic and/or have preexisting cardiovascular issues (which accounts for the majority of covid deaths). I also include people that have excessive and unavoidable human contact with 100± people as part of their daily lives/work (nurses, teachers, customer-facing service workers, etc). At l…

What risk of injury have you calculated for a 30 year old for each choice?

Re: Pfizer vaccine reprograms innate immune responses

#75
post #68

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Which ones?

Apparently they have unretired: https://www.sportskeeda.com/mma/5-ufc-fighters-suffered-badl... However, as you can see, young and fit is no protection. It's a roll of the dice.

> It's a roll of the dice.

So is getting the vaccine. It is a risk-reward calculation with many unknowns.

The following must be kept in mind: For the younger population, there a strong incentive to exaggerate the risk of the virus and to downplay the risk of the vaccine, in order to maximize vaccinations and (hopefully) minimize overall mortality. I must assume that public health authorities act in the collective interest, not mine.

Personally, I am unwilling to sacrifice myself for the "greater good", even if it's a really small risk. My individual risk of contracting COVID must exceed the individual risk of taking the vaccine. As long as that remains in question, I will remain hesitant.

Post reply on HN