Live data from Hacker News

Verizon Sells AOL and Yahoo to Apollo for $5B

nytimes.com

71–80 of 366 posts

Re: Verizon Sells AOL and Yahoo to Apollo for $5B

#71

Before people go all ballistic, please remember that yahoo and AOL make $700 million from Mail and a billion dollars from search. AOL sells huge number of paid dialup based email accounts(for older people though). So the sale price is approximately two years of revenue. Apollo is getting it cheap!

> Apollo is getting it cheap!

And Apollo will gut these entities for every dollar that they can.

Re: Verizon Sells AOL and Yahoo to Apollo for $5B

#74

Yahoo employee here... AMA

Is Yahoo actually turning a profit, if so which service contribute the most?

Also, are there any stats explaining why so Yahoo still have so many daily visitors? Is it just result of having a ton of service and then the numbers afe bundled? It seems hard to understand that pages like Yahoo (or msn.com) would attract so many users as the Alexa ranking would suggest.

Re: Verizon Sells AOL and Yahoo to Apollo for $5B

#78
I'm really surprised that Yahoo Finance has not been spun out as an independent company at this point. I think as a stand-alone company it could easily be worth in the billions of dollars.

Reportedly Yahoo Finance has revenue between $100M and $250M annually. With the increase in retail interest in investing it seems like a property that could have some growth potential behind it if they did things right and separate from Verizon.

Re: Verizon Sells AOL and Yahoo to Apollo for $5B

#79

I worked at HuffPo right after AOL was acquired by Verizon and before AOL/Yahoo became Oath. During this time Arianna left; rumor was she was forced out or at the very least, her power was undermined/neutered by Verizon and she was unable to fulfill her vision. Shortly after was the 2016 election. It was very surreal to be working there, while everyone on the editorial staff was sure HRC was going to win and then Tru…

Similar things have happened elsewhere in the media world. I've seen some of them first-hand within the org. It was hard to watch a 100-year old magazine of note continuously stretched to its possible thinnest by the parent company because the returns were not what they blindly promised and seemingly wanted to reduce the price of the properties to make a sale cheaper. Thankfully in that case the company who purchased the properties is actively working to bring them back to their former selves.
Post reply on HN