Live data from Hacker News

HSBC bans customers from buying Bitcoin-backer MicroStrategy shares

reuters.com

71–80 of 103 posts

Re: HSBC bans customers from buying Bitcoin-backer MicroStrategy shares

#71
post #37

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Tesla has a market cap of 673.80B at the moment. Their BTC holdings are barely a rounding error.

Which is a problem in itself. Tesla with a 2% market share in the US, is valued more than Toyota, Volkswagen, Daimler, General Motors, and BMW combined (40% of the domestic market). Toyota makes about $2,500 profit for every car sold. Tesla would need to make $50,000 per unit sold on average, or basically 100% profit on a Model 3, to justify the market cap.

Today value isn't about what Tesla does today, its about what people think Tesla will deliver in the future. The numbers and profits per car are basically meaningless. You buy if you think the number will become better not of you think they are awesome now and there isn't much progress possible anymore.

Re: HSBC bans customers from buying Bitcoin-backer MicroStrategy shares

#72
post #70

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Tesla has a market cap of 673.80B at the moment. Their BTC holdings are barely a rounding error.

Comparing their asset balance with the market cap of its stock is complete nonsense. Tesla has 100% access to the BTCs and other asset it holds but there is no access to the market cap. Its a fictive price tag on all existing shares. People use it to compare companies. The money does not exist anywhere and certainly can not be used by Tesla.

> The money does not exist anywhere and certainly can not be used by Tesla.

What exactly is stopping them from borrowing against their shares?

Re: HSBC bans customers from buying Bitcoin-backer MicroStrategy shares

#74
post #73

In related news, the bank will soon be renamed to HFSP Bank, in recognition of the crucial role it plays in reducing the risk of its clients making too much money.

You can get a nice hoodie with the new HFSP logo here:

https://www.koined.store/collections/out-and-about/products/...

Re: HSBC bans customers from buying Bitcoin-backer MicroStrategy shares

#75
post #70

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Comparing their asset balance with the market cap of its stock is complete nonsense. Tesla has 100% access to the BTCs and other asset it holds but there is no access to the market cap. Its a fictive price tag on all existing shares. People use it to compare companies. The money does not exist anywhere and certainly can not be used by Tesla.

> The money does not exist anywhere and certainly can not be used by Tesla. What exactly is stopping them from borrowing against their shares?

The market cap is calculated from all shares. Tesla obvious does not owe them.

Re: HSBC bans customers from buying Bitcoin-backer MicroStrategy shares

#76
post #70

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Tesla has a market cap of 673.80B at the moment. Their BTC holdings are barely a rounding error.

Comparing their asset balance with the market cap of its stock is complete nonsense. Tesla has 100% access to the BTCs and other asset it holds but there is no access to the market cap. Its a fictive price tag on all existing shares. People use it to compare companies. The money does not exist anywhere and certainly can not be used by Tesla.

> Comparing their asset balance with the market cap of its stock is complete nonsense

Eh, not really. They’re both stock (as opposed to flow) measures. And one is a subset of the other. That said, crypto as fraction of assets would be a more rigorous metric.

Re: HSBC bans customers from buying Bitcoin-backer MicroStrategy shares

#77

> “HSBC has no appetite for direct exposure to virtual currencies and limited appetite to facilitate products or securities that derive their value from VCs (virtual currencies),” HSBC said in a statement. But you wouldn't be? This is a product literally called "InvestDirect" where private individuals are buying stocks and assuming all the risk. If you don't want to offer margin on virtual currency products, more pow…

> if customers are buying with cash, it seems pretty suspect for the bank to claim that is increasing the bank's risk exposure

Cash trades still expose brokers to volatility due to settlement.

This policy is likely one part regulatory theatre and one part customer selection. Customers buying MicroStrategy stock are unlikely to be lucrative customers for the banking products HSBC hocks.

Re: HSBC bans customers from buying Bitcoin-backer MicroStrategy shares

#79

> “HSBC has no appetite for direct exposure to virtual currencies and limited appetite to facilitate products or securities that derive their value from VCs (virtual currencies),” HSBC said in a statement. But you wouldn't be? This is a product literally called "InvestDirect" where private individuals are buying stocks and assuming all the risk. If you don't want to offer margin on virtual currency products, more pow…

> if customers are buying with cash, it seems pretty suspect for the bank to claim that is increasing the bank's risk exposure Cash trades still expose brokers to volatility due to settlement. This policy is likely one part regulatory theatre and one part customer selection. Customers buying MicroStrategy stock are unlikely to be lucrative customers for the banking products HSBC hocks.

Yeah if they were worried about settlement risk they could just not release funds/shares until they settle. But that’s probably harder to implement than a blanket ban and they have nothing to gain by catering to the meme shares crowd.

Re: HSBC bans customers from buying Bitcoin-backer MicroStrategy shares

#80
post #70

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Comparing their asset balance with the market cap of its stock is complete nonsense. Tesla has 100% access to the BTCs and other asset it holds but there is no access to the market cap. Its a fictive price tag on all existing shares. People use it to compare companies. The money does not exist anywhere and certainly can not be used by Tesla.

> Comparing their asset balance with the market cap of its stock is complete nonsense Eh, not really. They’re both stock (as opposed to flow) measures. And one is a subset of the other. That said, crypto as fraction of assets would be a more rigorous metric.

>And one is a subset of the other.

Not alt all. Mark cap is a fictive value. Assets hold by a company aren't fictive and are not part of the market cap at all. Market cap is simply the price of all stocks at the current market price of one.

>crypto as fraction of assets That would make more sense but also would need to include debts.

Post reply on HN