Live data from Hacker News

Apple unveils M1, its first system-on-a-chip for portable Mac computers

9to5mac.com

71–80 of 1001 posts

Re: Apple unveils M1, its first system-on-a-chip for portable Mac computers

#71
post #30
post #15

An 8 core processor on a Macbook Air that is also energy efficient? That is truly impressive. I never thought I would consider using Macbook Airs after all the years of using Macbook Pros, but Apple surprises me once again.

Seems pretty clear they're using big.LITTLE-style low-power and high-power cores on the same chip. No fan however, is impressive....

But it can't sustain max performance. That is reserved for the MacBook Pro with a fan.

Re: Apple unveils M1, its first system-on-a-chip for portable Mac computers

#72
post #49

All the Macs looked quite impressive! It was well worth waiting for these (at least for me). But I was disappointed that the maximum RAM is 16GB. I would’ve preferred a 32GB option for better future proofing (especially with web applications needing more and more memory). Edit: Considering the fact that the RAM won’t be upgradeable (it’s part of the SoC), this limitation is a big bummer. What may be worse is that all…

Was that for just mb air or all of them? I missed that part.

32GB is an option on the pro

Re: Apple unveils M1, its first system-on-a-chip for portable Mac computers

#75

16GB max it looks like.

huge own-goal on Apple's part. It would be literally impossible for me to use this machine to do my job. I guess I'll have to wait until M2. Edit: If it wasn't clear, this was not a joke. I develop a relatively heavyweight service on the JVM, and between my IDE, the code I run, and all the gradle build daemon stuff, I regularly use up more than 32GB. Often over 50GB. (Although some swap is tolerable, having the major…

How many Slack instances does your job require?!

Re: Apple unveils M1, its first system-on-a-chip for portable Mac computers

#76
post #70
post #41

Earlier quoted context omitted.

As one has a fan and the other not, they are probably clocked differently and the cooled one might sustain full power infinitely. The pro also has a larger battery, better speakers and microphones and the touch bar.

"and the touch bar" that is not exactly a selling point :)

Indeed, I'm considering getting an air specifically because it doesn't have the touch bar.

Re: Apple unveils M1, its first system-on-a-chip for portable Mac computers

#77
I've been using my Macbook Pro Retina ever since it was first released in 2012 and haven't been impressed enough to upgrade since then. It's on its last leg though and this upgrade looks exciting for a change. I hope they release the updated 16 inch soon. Not thrilled they insist on keeping the touch bar, but other than that this seems like they are headed in a good direction.

Re: Apple unveils M1, its first system-on-a-chip for portable Mac computers

#78
post #49

All the Macs looked quite impressive! It was well worth waiting for these (at least for me). But I was disappointed that the maximum RAM is 16GB. I would’ve preferred a 32GB option for better future proofing (especially with web applications needing more and more memory). Edit: Considering the fact that the RAM won’t be upgradeable (it’s part of the SoC), this limitation is a big bummer. What may be worse is that all…

[deleted]

Re: Apple unveils M1, its first system-on-a-chip for portable Mac computers

#79

Did I understand correctly that MacBook Pro and Air will share the same M1 CPU? Previous models had a massive delta in CPU performance based on using low power (Air, no fan) or medium power (Pro, with dual fans) Intel chips

I think there's still a no fan vs fan distinction so they'll still be able to run the Pro more powerful, but it looks like it. I half suspect the Air was the one they wanted to release and they just didn't want there to be no Pro faster than an Air in the lineup.

Re: Apple unveils M1, its first system-on-a-chip for portable Mac computers

#80

16GB max it looks like.

I don't understand this. Does the chip make up for it? Do I have to wait until the next generation for 32gb?

The RAM is in the chip, so presumably they just want to iterate a bit first before just throwing RAM at it.
Post reply on HN