I'm finding more and more that it might finally be time to switch back to Firefox. Is Google still planning to destroy adblock with Manifest V3?
Encrypted SNI is another feature which is completely absent in chrome but available in firefox.
Facebook Container for Firefox
71–80 of 446 posts
Re: Facebook Container for Firefox
#72Earlier quoted context omitted.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/multi-account... You're welcome.
The reason Facebook Container exists is because the UX of the generic version is awful. Trying to created a new container to always open a site with has something like half a dozen steps. And of course we won't get a dedicated 'Google Container' from Mozilla because despite all their hot talk they know what side their bread is buttered on.
Select "always open this site in".
Re: Facebook Container for Firefox
#73Re: Facebook Container for Firefox
#74I'm finding more and more that it might finally be time to switch back to Firefox. Is Google still planning to destroy adblock with Manifest V3?
I'm finding more and more that i want to move to a Chrome fork (Brave) but TreeStyleTabs (Sidebery) keeps me with FF.
Re: Facebook Container for Firefox
#75I love the general idea behind the container (sandboxed browsing). However, I'm not clear on the exact privacy benefit relative to the much easier path of blocking 3rd party cookies in your browser of choice and installing uBlock Origin. What specific tracking is no longer possible using containers that is currently possible if you're using one or both of those protections? Is it something about 3rd party scripts tha…
[1] https://www.sportsbettingdime.com/news/nfl/week-7-opening-li...
Re: Facebook Container for Firefox
#76Earlier quoted context omitted.
You might be able to escape facebook using ublock, but you're going to have trouble escaping google. It's everywhere : youtube embeds, google cdn (for scripts/fonts), google maps embeds/autocomplete, recaptcha.
Do these embeds matter if you block 3rd party cookies and don't click on the embedded content?
Re: Facebook Container for Firefox
#77I use Firefox multi-account containers[1] extensively, it's honestly the primary reason I use Firefox these days. The big win for me is that I _hate_ having to use the Google account switcher, so I basically set up a container for each Gmail account (work, personal, old email, etc). The nice bonus feature is you can have certain sites default to containers. I had a paid YouTube account for a while, for example, so ha…
thanks for the sticky windows tip
Re: Facebook Container for Firefox
#78I use Firefox multi-account containers[1] extensively, it's honestly the primary reason I use Firefox these days. The big win for me is that I _hate_ having to use the Google account switcher, so I basically set up a container for each Gmail account (work, personal, old email, etc). The nice bonus feature is you can have certain sites default to containers. I had a paid YouTube account for a while, for example, so ha…
Re: Facebook Container for Firefox
#79A few others: - Temporary Containers[0] - Google Container[1] - Google Container w/ Integrations (YouTube, AdTech, Apps, etc)[2] - Reddit Container[3] There are a few others[4] as well, but I've found the Temporary Containers solves the 80%. -- [0] - https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/temporary-con... [1] - https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/google-contai... [2] - https://addons.mozilla.org/en…
Re: Facebook Container for Firefox
#80I'm loving Firefox Containers for various use cases, but is running Google/Facebook in them worth the extra hassle if you use uBO/Privacy Badger? It blocks all that stuff anyway.