Live data from Hacker News

Mysterious ‘super-archaic’ populations had multiple trysts with human ancestors

sciencemag.org

71–80 of 100 posts

Re: Mysterious ‘super-archaic’ populations had multiple trysts with human ancestors

#71

Man, I've always actually kinda wondered about this. I know it's macabre, but I think about human migratory routines and when different groups clashed back when life was so primitive and brutish, they're must've been those tendencies to rape and sexually conquer the opposition. Surely that is reflected in the genetic ledger of time. What a crazy insight. Genetics is such an interesting field. It's bonkers there's jus…

You know, the title of this article puts a slant on this investigation by choosing the word tryst.

Why couldn't they have been meaningful relationships?

Re: Mysterious ‘super-archaic’ populations had multiple trysts with human ancestors

#72
post #25

Earlier quoted context omitted.

the 1918 spanish flu death rate was around 20%. It was only in March 2020 after covid19 was mainstream news it got edited in Wikipedia to show 2% (not sure if that's changed by now), you can check the edit history. But in short, in 1918, there were coffin shortages, compared to the toilet paper shortages with covid19. covid19 and the Spanish flu are not even in the same weight class, not even a little bit, whereas ye…

I agree that some people may think things are worse than they are. I feel like the zeitgeist, at least in my area, is a lingering uncertainty of exactly how bad things are, due to a lack of testing, and of how bad things can get, as we saw in italian and new york hospitals. My understanding, however, is that the transmissibility of covid-19 is 3 to 10 times greater than the common flu. For instance, our local public…

To your point about transmissibility versus Flu there is this report: https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/69/wr/mm6937a6.htm

It looks like our protections for Covid-19 were very effective against Flu transmission at least that is the assumption.

Re: Mysterious ‘super-archaic’ populations had multiple trysts with human ancestors

#73
post #25

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Covid is comparable to flu with a higher mortality rate. So, like 1918 pandemic flu?

the 1918 spanish flu death rate was around 20%. It was only in March 2020 after covid19 was mainstream news it got edited in Wikipedia to show 2% (not sure if that's changed by now), you can check the edit history. But in short, in 1918, there were coffin shortages, compared to the toilet paper shortages with covid19. covid19 and the Spanish flu are not even in the same weight class, not even a little bit, whereas ye…

The topic can only be discussed using political speech until November 3rd then on the 4th we can go back to using scientific speech.

Re: Mysterious ‘super-archaic’ populations had multiple trysts with human ancestors

#74
post #35

Man, I've always actually kinda wondered about this. I know it's macabre, but I think about human migratory routines and when different groups clashed back when life was so primitive and brutish, they're must've been those tendencies to rape and sexually conquer the opposition. Surely that is reflected in the genetic ledger of time. What a crazy insight. Genetics is such an interesting field. It's bonkers there's jus…

I encourage you to explore the early history of the pre-Roman Empire peoples. These were largely mythologies that the romans retroactively constructed for themselves (i.e. they had the opportunity to omit the raping and kidnapping in retellings, but chose not to). It’s full of “and then tribe X invaded and the land of Y, took their women and enslaved their men”. Back and forth for centuries. This behavior was cyclica…

"pre-Roman Empire peoples"

Do you mean the Bible?

"Only in the cities of these peoples that the LORD your God is giving you as an inheritance, you shall not leave alive anything that breathes. But you shall utterly destroy them, the Hittite and the Amorite, the Canaanite and the Perizzite, the Hivite and the Jebusite, as the LORD your God has commanded you,...? Deut. 20:16..

Re: Mysterious ‘super-archaic’ populations had multiple trysts with human ancestors

#75
post #51

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Any classification system that can't tell you something about the objects it classifies is objectively useless for anything but naming things They are both canis , you know. The difference in species designation tells you very little because that's not a problem that can be solved. It's not an issue of misclassification. The specific designations latrans and lupus tell you a lot.

Canis is the genus. Even barring classification mistakes, cross-species breeding across genus is not impossible, it's just very less likely to produce viable and/or fertile offspring. A classic example is the breeding between Equus Caballus (horse) and Equus Asinus (donkey): it works and you get a Mule. The genetic difference between the horse and the donkey is non trivial, they even have a different number of chromo…

I mean, Canis dates to Linnaeus, so that it's paraphyletic should be the presumption.

Re: Mysterious ‘super-archaic’ populations had multiple trysts with human ancestors

#76
post #51

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Canis is the genus. Even barring classification mistakes, cross-species breeding across genus is not impossible, it's just very less likely to produce viable and/or fertile offspring. A classic example is the breeding between Equus Caballus (horse) and Equus Asinus (donkey): it works and you get a Mule. The genetic difference between the horse and the donkey is non trivial, they even have a different number of chromo…

I mean, Canis dates to Linnaeus, so that it's paraphyletic should be the presumption.

what about Equus? that's also introduced by Linnaeus AFAIK; could you please explain what you mean; I'm actually a noob so please state things explicitly so I can understand things (I'm ok with looking specific things up, but it's harder to look up "between the lines" things)

Re: Mysterious ‘super-archaic’ populations had multiple trysts with human ancestors

#77
post #39
post #36

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think it’s that all the worlds were seeded by some sort of progenitor race millions of years ago. Also they can interbreed I believe.

For Star Trek, in-universe this happened at least twice. The relevant episodes are TOS 2x22 Return to Tomorrow [0] and TNG 6x20 The Chase [1]. VOY 3x23 Distant Origin [2] also in-universe establishes convergent evolution is very likely to create humanoids (makes no reference to the other two episodes, as far as I remember, but it's kinda wishy-washy in that it could be highly likely because of the two progenitor spec…

I know some people don't like Enterprise, but it IS in-universe, so lets not forget ENT 1x05 Unexpected [0].

I kid; I know you said "at least".

[0]https://memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/Unexpected_(episode)

Re: Mysterious ‘super-archaic’ populations had multiple trysts with human ancestors

#78
post #40

> The story of human evolution is full of ancient trysts. Genes from fossils have shown that the ancestors of many living people mated with Neanderthals and with Denisovans, a mysterious group of extinct humans who lived in Asia In the case of Neanderthals, isn't that "all" people rather than "many" people? Neanderthals are believed to have gone extinct 40000 years ago. But there was an article here the other day abo…

Subsaharan Africans are believed not to have any Neanderthal admixture, and the logistics of the spread out of Africa would be a good reason why.

Admixture is different from ancestry.

Your kids only get half your DNA, their kids only get half their DNA, and so on. You can eventually end up with descendants who have none of your DNA.

If the genetic isopoint really was after the Neanderthals went extinct than everyone in sub Saharan Africa has Neanderthal ancestry even if none of them have Neanderthal admixture.

Re: Mysterious ‘super-archaic’ populations had multiple trysts with human ancestors

#79
post #39

Earlier quoted context omitted.

For Star Trek, in-universe this happened at least twice. The relevant episodes are TOS 2x22 Return to Tomorrow [0] and TNG 6x20 The Chase [1]. VOY 3x23 Distant Origin [2] also in-universe establishes convergent evolution is very likely to create humanoids (makes no reference to the other two episodes, as far as I remember, but it's kinda wishy-washy in that it could be highly likely because of the two progenitor spec…

I know some people don't like Enterprise, but it IS in-universe, so lets not forget ENT 1x05 Unexpected [0]. I kid; I know you said "at least". [0] https://memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/Unexpected_(episode)

Oh, I was referring to progenitor seeding specifically. In terms of interbreeding, there's a few more prominent ones: Spock, B'Elanna Torres, and Alexander Rozhenko and B'Elanna's daughter (who are respectively 3/4 human and 1/4 human, showing there likely isn't an infertility problem like with mules [0]).

(Though I admit that the ENT example was certainly unique in the differing biologies)

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mule#Fertility

Re: Mysterious ‘super-archaic’ populations had multiple trysts with human ancestors

#80
post #69
post #29

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You're overlooking the fact that even if easily breedable pool of foreign species existed along H. sapiens, given enough time they would either be purged or become common ancestors to everyone by now. Since they were purged and exist as remnants in individuals' DNA.

If they are remanants in people's DNA, they did become common ancestors, no? Everyone's family tree collapses to the same individuals at 5500 BC, after the other humans went extinct.(1) That means we are all descended from non Homo Sapiens humans. What I'm trying to say is that they were not "purged," we are their descendants. We got most of our genetic material from the Homo Sapiens side, but there is continuity wit…

Common ancestors are in all humans IIRC. While say Neanderthal DNA is only in subset of populations.
Post reply on HN