Live data from Hacker News

GitHub is working on renaming default branch from “master”

twitter.com

71–80 of 280 posts

Re: GitHub is working on renaming default branch from “master”

#71
post #35

I'm a strong supporter of social justice. I don't really object to people putting in work to change language like that if they think it's important. Especially when the work required is minimal. That said, this is slightly ridiculous. Have customers seriously complained about the term "master"? And my impression was that the usage was more similar to "master copy" than "master of the plantation". Honestly, it's frust…

I don't think it's because people are offended at the use of the word master, in this case. I think, that it's symbolic. By making a point of getting rid of the word master, you're showing that black lives matter.

[flagged]

Re: GitHub is working on renaming default branch from “master”

#73
post #72

It's an old one, but relevant to the topic: Antirez from Redis wrote a blog article on this topic (demands to change master-slave terminology in Redis sources) roughly 2 years ago, http://antirez.com/news/122 .

The first comment is on the mark: http://antirez.com/news/122#comment-4084872912

Re: GitHub is working on renaming default branch from “master”

#75
post #38
post #18

Earlier quoted context omitted.

counterpoint: I'll be pissed off and emotionally triggered, knowing that they bent over backwards just to be "politically correct" or "progressive".

It's a bit of a paradox isn't it, if you really are emotionally triggered by people making a gesture to black developers, doesn't that suggest that developers are really easily emotionally triggered, and therefore making the gesture is actually important and therefore you shouldn't be triggered because it's not bending over backward to be politically correct it's actually tackling something that's a real issue?

Almost, but not quite. At least:

I think you can say "that people are arguing about it makes it significantly political".

I don't think you can say "that people are arguing about it makes it a meaningful thing to do".

Re: GitHub is working on renaming default branch from “master”

#77
post #50

What bugs me about crap like this is that it ignores world history, makes these people feel good about doing nothing of consequence, and takes attention away from things that will actually help. If you are going to help, actually do something that improves the lives of people. Maybe, you should really put some effort into beefing up the Computer Science programs in black high schools and colleges? You are Microsoft,…

Little known fact: The single, and only thing being done right now to address systemic racism is github renaming the default branch to master. I wish people would do other stuff like March, and donate money, and goad corporations into donating millions of dollars to minority owned businesses, passing new laws that address historical abuses of power and the police state. But no. We've got 350 million people solely foc…

No post body was provided.

Re: GitHub is working on renaming default branch from “master”

#78

What about people who lost somebody to a python attack?

If my dad died of Tetanus, should I be against memory safety?

The argument was "if somebody is emotionally triggered by using some term, we should replace that term with something else".

I'm not suggesting it's a good point, I'm just pointing out that there's going to be a lot of renaming to do.

Re: GitHub is working on renaming default branch from “master”

#79
I support changing master - slave.

But the use of master here is from 5 b: an original from which copies can be made especially : a master recording (such as a magnetic tape)

There is no implied slave.

It's derived from masterpiece. Something that a master craftsman has created.

Master has many definitions and usages. Master of a slave is only one minor usage.

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/master

Re: GitHub is working on renaming default branch from “master”

#80
post #35

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't think it's because people are offended at the use of the word master, in this case. I think, that it's symbolic. By making a point of getting rid of the word master, you're showing that black lives matter.

They are hardly related. Will you be removing my master's degree next?

Oh that's the same thing. That indicates mastery over the material you studied. Knowledge has become subservient to you.
Post reply on HN