Live data from Hacker News

Sharedrop – Easy P2P file transfer powered by WebRTC

github.com

71–79 of 79 posts

Re: Sharedrop – Easy P2P file transfer powered by WebRTC

#71
post #40
post #36

Earlier quoted context omitted.

OP was talking about the generous 2.5 GB limit, while you're referring to the stingy 2.5 GB limit.

Indeed, that's why I posted. I found it to be an interesting juxtaposition. :)

Haha, well it is hosted free on their servers. I guess I thought it was nice compared to the 1gb you get free on Dropbox.

Re: Sharedrop – Easy P2P file transfer powered by WebRTC

#72
post #19

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Meanwhile, I found the 2.5 GB limit on Firefox Send really frustrating this weekend when I was trying to send 80 GB of raw video files to a friend. :) Turns out there's very few options available for really large P2P file transfers, short of hosting an FTP server.

Setup a syncthing folder share with your friend. Drop your 80gb in the folder Data syncs over p2p e2ee overnight. Friend removes the copy from their sync folder and it vanishes from yours

Yeah, if I need my mom to setup syncthing and open some ports or let her computer run over night without going to sleep to send some files. I rather send her an usb stick. If I just have tell her click on that link and after that click on ok... it's doable.

Re: Sharedrop – Easy P2P file transfer powered by WebRTC

#73
post #19
post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I started using Firefox Send recently, I have been really impressed with the simplicity and easy of use. I haven’t tried it, but it is open source and possible to self-host if you so chose. But for the time being it remains free, and you can share up to a generous 2.5 GB if you log in with a Firefox account so I see no reason to put in the effort yet. That being said, Sharedrop seems to be a different use case, only…

Meanwhile, I found the 2.5 GB limit on Firefox Send really frustrating this weekend when I was trying to send 80 GB of raw video files to a friend. :) Turns out there's very few options available for really large P2P file transfers, short of hosting an FTP server.

As it is open source you can always just run a new docker of Send, tweak the ENV variable for max file size and bobs your uncle.

https://send.mirorauhala.fi/

Re: Sharedrop – Easy P2P file transfer powered by WebRTC

#74
post #21

Firebase is a really attractive service to quickly and easily bring powerful features to any app, but I can't help it.. I feel like I'd be including yet another way for Google to track people. Therefore I avoid any app with Firebase in them, no matter how cool they are. Am I overly suspicious here?

Snapdrop.net[0] is a similar PWA that specifically avoids using Firebase (or any db). I saw it on here some time ago, but don't recall if it was a Show HN.

[0]: https://github.com/RobinLinus/snapdrop

Edit: just seen this was mentioned earlier down thread.

Re: Sharedrop – Easy P2P file transfer powered by WebRTC

#75
post #65
post #56

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Well, you could use a private tracker/one that doesn't dump it's torrent-list publicly, and mark the torrent file itself as private, so your client won't share it on the DHT. Also, encrypting is orthogonal.

Then find yourself shocked when the far end's torrent client ignores the private setting?

Which doesn't really happen, because all those private invite-only trackers hand out perma-bans for that.

So a good chunk of users will get really angry if a client comes with that bug. I haven't yet even found a way to make any ignore this.

Re: Sharedrop – Easy P2P file transfer powered by WebRTC

#76
post #7

I use Firefox Send (works on all browsers), it's end to end encrypted and has automatic expiry: https://send.firefox.com/

For the tech savvy people, checkout ffsend as fully featured CLI tool for Send (shameless plug): https://github.com/timvisee/ffsend

Wow! Thank you so much!

Re: Sharedrop – Easy P2P file transfer powered by WebRTC

#77
post #21

Firebase is a really attractive service to quickly and easily bring powerful features to any app, but I can't help it.. I feel like I'd be including yet another way for Google to track people. Therefore I avoid any app with Firebase in them, no matter how cool they are. Am I overly suspicious here?

I just avoid it because I don't want to have to find a new app when Google shuts Firebase down.

Re: Sharedrop – Easy P2P file transfer powered by WebRTC

#78

> "ShareDrop allows you to send files to other devices in the same local network (i.e. devices with the same public IP address)" That's an interesting definition of "same local network". So, this doesn't work for networks not behind NAT? Or for IPv6?

I believe it means same subnet, but it's possible that it only works behind a NAT because it uses an out-of-network service (Firebase) to tell it who's on a single network (i.e. who has the same public IP).

But that's just the thing, you've written the same thing as they have.

> who's on a single network (i.e. who has the same public IP)

Those aren't even close to equivalent. Now that most ISPs offer IPv6, they aren't even equivalent most of the time.

Re: Sharedrop – Easy P2P file transfer powered by WebRTC

#79
post #37
post #35

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I tried uploading the archive to iCloud, but the server rejected it as too large. None of my other cloud storage accounts had enough free space. Paying for extra space seemed overkill, given that this was literally a one-time P2P file transfer. I really should just be able to send a file to another IP address without having to pay for storage somewhere.

This works _really_ well: https://github.com/warner/magic-wormhole

This was spotted on HN 3 weeks ago: https://github.com/schollz/croc
Post reply on HN