Earlier quoted context omitted.
I feel like there's an argument to be made for having an actual human monitoring large transactions. If you're trying to take out a $600,000 mortgage at 3 AM on a Sunday, that probably shouldn't go through, or at the very least have some human verification. Humans tend to work 9-5 Monday to Friday
Surely anomaly detection is better done by a machine? I guess there's a certain level of human "intuition" about these things but is this not what most banks anti-fraud systems do already?
I've worked with machines. I don't think this is a good idea.