So what caused that very short spike in "Jaime" as a girls name? Looks like it might have occurred right around 1960.
The Most Gender-Switched Names in the U.S.
71–80 of 159 posts
Re: The Most Gender-Switched Names in the U.S.
#72Somehow the results seem dissatisfying. This really feels like it should be measuring the area under the curve, at the very least. Measuring "peak to peak" seems silly.
Re: The Most Gender-Switched Names in the U.S.
#73I suspect popularity would yield pretty different insights, especially if you could see more "sounds like" patterns.
For example, my name: Tristan, isn't on the list, but Tristyn is. Tristan is _much_ more common.
I found this site that also provides some insight that I think is the same SSA data, that's relatively easy to play with: http://www.ourbabynamer.com/Tristan-name-popularity.html
Ratios of boys:girls in 2018:
- Tristan 84:1 3833 total - Tristyn 2:1 99 total
Similarly:
- Austyn: 342 total, 1:3 b:g ratio - Austin: 4778 total, 36:1 ratio
It's still interesting, and fun to dive into the different ways you can look at it. It's like, the more "uncommon" the mispelling, the more people are willing to switch gender, perhaps?
Re: The Most Gender-Switched Names in the U.S.
#74Re: The Most Gender-Switched Names in the U.S.
#75Re: The Most Gender-Switched Names in the U.S.
#76At the risk of turning an innocent topic into a political discussion, I wonder how much of this trend can be explained by societal privilege. Ie, parents (consciously or subconsciously) want their daughters to benefit from appearing male (at least on paper) and so give them ambiguous or masculine names. And of course, the same parents would do the exact opposite for their sons, by not selecting any name that might be…
Re: The Most Gender-Switched Names in the U.S.
#77First, this is a great and original (AFAIK) post. Kudos to the author! Second, I actually find the most interesting fact to be completely unmentioned by the author: that in the first chart (greatest absolute changes), of the 30 biggest swaps, only two were female->male, while the other 28 (over 90%!) were male->female. It's a remarkable fact -- makes me think of how it's historically been much more acceptable for wom…
> It's a remarkable fact -- makes me think of how it's historically been much more acceptable for women to adopt men's styles of clothing, but much less accepted for men to adopt's women's styles of clothing. This is still the case today. I feel like the two are entirely unrelated, actually. If anything, we’ve seen the opposite phenomenon happen in every market. Buffalo Wild Wings commercials that cater to masculinit…
Tom Ford, Bvlgari, Calvin Klein, and Chanel all have uni-sex fragrances now. Chanel's is called "Boy" and CK's is very inclusively named "all". And there's a _huge_ trend in high-end cosmetics that makeup has no gender. CoverGirl even has a "CoverBoy" spokesmodel now.
And of course, any company that dares to "pink it and shrink it" will feel the wrath of Ellen and r/pointlesslygendered.
Re: The Most Gender-Switched Names in the U.S.
#78Re: The Most Gender-Switched Names in the U.S.
#79At the risk of turning an innocent topic into a political discussion, I wonder how much of this trend can be explained by societal privilege. Ie, parents (consciously or subconsciously) want their daughters to benefit from appearing male (at least on paper) and so give them ambiguous or masculine names. And of course, the same parents would do the exact opposite for their sons, by not selecting any name that might be…
Also in my experience, there is a lot more at stake for a young boy with a "girl's" name than for a young girl with a "boy's" name. Feel free to contradict me if you have the opposite experience. But I feel that boys would be teased much harder, and their masculinity would be called into question throughout their life simply based on their name.
Re: The Most Gender-Switched Names in the U.S.
#80I find the Krishna name interesting. Krishna is a male Hindu deity. However, it seems a lot of people were naming their girls Krishna. Now, it is a boy's name again. My speculation for the cause of this is that Hare Krishna became popular among certain US groups in the 1970's and a lot of them named their daughters Krishna. Then, in more recent times, there has been a lot more immigration from India into the US, and…