Mirth – a type-safe concatenative purely functional programming language

Post by pmarreck » Sat, Jul 13, 2019, 4:32 PM UTC

tunesmith wrote: post #11

hombre_fatal wrote: post #7

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Your profile says you like tinkering, yet you don't understand why others would tinker and experiment with new things? Do you only give yourself a pass for tinkering instead of using your precious free-time to credentialize in and improve existing software?

Man, I don't know if it's against site guidelines, but I've never liked using people's bios - even if public on HN - as ammunition against their comments. Isn't it better to just respond to the content of the comments themselves?

Post by dang » Sat, Jul 13, 2019, 5:45 PM UTC

0_gravitas wrote: post #62

coldtea wrote: post #60

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I know you are a gigantic egomaniac and I'm wasting my time writing this, but if you could ever repress your inflated sense of (mis)justice for two seconds, you might notice that the poster actually asked a perfectly valid question. Also a perfectly trivial one, an insulting one, and one that has been asked countless times, and that has no real place in a post presenting a new language but goes to meta yak shaving…

Seeing as his account is 11 hours old as of my writing this and that this is his only comment I have a little paranoid-detective feeling that this may be from PC, just an alt account, even if not they are clearly a very angry person

Post by edem » Mon, Jul 15, 2019, 11:13 AM UTC

hombre_fatal wrote: post #7

edem wrote: post #2

Why do we need yet another language instead of improving the existing ones?

Your profile says you like tinkering, yet you don't understand why others would tinker and experiment with new things? Do you only give yourself a pass for tinkering instead of using your precious free-time to credentialize in and improve existing software?