Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is a better solution overall, as it's "by default". A hardware switch relies on the user to be privacy conscious. An LED which is physically connected to the camera circuit (!) is immediately noticeable if it turns on unexpectedly.
As a layperson in this arena, I'm skeptical as to whether it's a great solution. Is it possible to turn the camera on and off very quickly? If so, a smart hacker could do that really quickly and if the owner ever notices they would probably think there is a problem with the electrical rather than thinking they are being monitored.
Camera and microphone require HTTPS in Firefox 68
71–80 of 215 posts
Re: Camera and microphone require HTTPS in Firefox 68
#72Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is a better solution overall, as it's "by default". A hardware switch relies on the user to be privacy conscious. An LED which is physically connected to the camera circuit (!) is immediately noticeable if it turns on unexpectedly.
As a layperson in this arena, I'm skeptical as to whether it's a great solution. Is it possible to turn the camera on and off very quickly? If so, a smart hacker could do that really quickly and if the owner ever notices they would probably think there is a problem with the electrical rather than thinking they are being monitored.
Not particularly. At least on my 2015 rMBP, using code that I wrote (so I know it's not doing anything extraneous), the light is on for about a quarter of a second before the first frame is returned from the camera. This is because the LED is literally showing you when the camera has power (which includes any sort of handshake with the system), not just when it's capturing frames.
Is that enough that a user who's really concentrating on the screen will nonetheless see the light come on? Not necessarily. But GP has a good point about this being a feature that doesn't rely on the user being proactive.
Re: Camera and microphone require HTTPS in Firefox 68
#73Dear Apple: for Christmas I'd like physical, no-bullshit power shutoff switches for your camera and microphone on the Macbook Pro. Other devices too—if you can manage it, that'd be great. Sincerely, the people who put tape over their cameras, the people who don't because it's ugly and messes with closing the lid but wish they could, and the people who would be in one of those two camps if they understood the risk (so…
If anyone is looking for a nice webcam cover for laptops, I've found the super-thin ones (marketed as "0.7mm thin" by EYSOFT and others on Amazon, etc) are fantastic. Very cheap, very thin, visually unobtrusive, and dead-simple to use. Doesn't interfere with closing my Macbook at all, it protrudes less than the rubber bumper around the screen border. Still miss the physical mic mute button on my old Thinkpad X230...…
Re: Camera and microphone require HTTPS in Firefox 68
#74Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's useful, but it's not as reassuring as a hardware switch where you can see it work. (For video, anyway. I don't see any similar solution for audio.)
Two reasons why switch is better: 1. If it does happen to light up, what would you do, turn off your computer? That's shitty. 2. What if your AFK and aren't looking at the light?
Re: Camera and microphone require HTTPS in Firefox 68
#75Earlier quoted context omitted.
The kernel is not BSD, it's based on the Mach microkernel [1] with a BSD compatibility layer implemented on top. The whole thing collectively is called XNU [2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mach_(kernel) [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XNU
It was developed from something that was based on Mach. However, it is also based on BSD, as your second link states. > The BSD code present in XNU came from the FreeBSD kernel. Although much of it has been significantly modified, code sharing still occurs between Apple and the FreeBSD Project.
Re: Camera and microphone require HTTPS in Firefox 68
#76Earlier quoted context omitted.
LED brightness is controlled by pulse-width modulation: at low frequencies, the camera LED would appear dimly lit. A more sophisticated approach might be to combine gaze detection to ramp-down frequency if someone is looking towards the camera/LED.
A momentary flicker would not be perceptible in a lit room.
You might not even see the flicker but if you catch it in your peripheral vision often enough, or you found out someone else was caught by it or it hit the news big time, you’d suddenly become more suspicious about that momentary flash. Maybe even paranoid.
Re: Camera and microphone require HTTPS in Firefox 68
#77Earlier quoted context omitted.
I remember there was a story saying that it's possible, via software only (due to a "bug" and some "poor" hardware design), to turn on the camera without activating the LED.
https://jscholarship.library.jhu.edu/handle/1774.2/36569 (2013)
Re: Camera and microphone require HTTPS in Firefox 68
#78Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's useful, but it's not as reassuring as a hardware switch where you can see it work. (For video, anyway. I don't see any similar solution for audio.)
Two reasons why switch is better: 1. If it does happen to light up, what would you do, turn off your computer? That's shitty. 2. What if your AFK and aren't looking at the light?
Re: Camera and microphone require HTTPS in Firefox 68
#79Earlier quoted context omitted.
If anyone is looking for a nice webcam cover for laptops, I've found the super-thin ones (marketed as "0.7mm thin" by EYSOFT and others on Amazon, etc) are fantastic. Very cheap, very thin, visually unobtrusive, and dead-simple to use. Doesn't interfere with closing my Macbook at all, it protrudes less than the rubber bumper around the screen border. Still miss the physical mic mute button on my old Thinkpad X230...…
FWIW I had one of these on my laptop and the screen now has a crack that started right where this was.
Re: Camera and microphone require HTTPS in Firefox 68
#80Dear Apple: for Christmas I'd like physical, no-bullshit power shutoff switches for your camera and microphone on the Macbook Pro. Other devices too—if you can manage it, that'd be great. Sincerely, the people who put tape over their cameras, the people who don't because it's ugly and messes with closing the lid but wish they could, and the people who would be in one of those two camps if they understood the risk (so…
I think I understand the risk, and I definitely would not bother with such a switch even were it available. So maybe I actually don't understand it. What exactly is the risk? Have there been any actual cases of someone being spied on with their laptop webcam that would have been prevented by a switch? I'm only aware of cases where the webcam switch would not have helped (e.g. roommate sets up notebook to record owner…
People would get someone infected, and then share the credentials so everyone could watch. So, I personally know of a handful of people that were spied on 20 years ago.