Isn't that just like 1 month's worth of revenue? That amounts to absolutely nothing in today's world, not even an incentive to reduce the bad behavior. Jail time for lawbreaking executives needs to happen . The financial penalties do not dissuade bad behavior or act as a deterrent, so the same crimes will continue to be committed. Are there any peer-reviewed studies looking at deterrence of financial/tech/privacy cri…
What crimes would they be jailed for?
There's an element of intent that might be hard to prove. Intent is legally defined as "the decision to bring about a prohibited consequence." If you know your actions will result in prohibited consequences and take them anyway, you are deciding to bring about a prohibited consequence.
Conspiracy might fit, too. You've got 2 or more people intentionally agreeing to these practices that they know will result in identity theft and then taking action to put those practices into use.
I guess they'd have to start with somebody who provably had their identity stolen as a result of the practices, though.