Live data from Hacker News

Freenet: A Distributed Anonymous Information Storage and Retrieval System (2000) [pdf]

snap.stanford.edu

71–73 of 73 posts

Re: Freenet: A Distributed Anonymous Information Storage and Retrieval System (2000) [pdf]

#71
post #65

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Similar impressions here. Freenet was an impressive vehicle for exploring some very important topics and ideas. Unfortunately, besides the problems you mention, the community around it was ... unpleasant. On a good day they could seem a bit overzealous. On a bad day they were downright crazy, and they were always hostile to any advice or criticism from others even in their own field. For example, Freenet isn't a perm…

"it’s like a cache" is what we’ve been saying as the default description for years. When did you last interact with the freenet community?

> When did you last interact with the freenet community?

When it was still relevant, i.e. a long time ago.

Re: Freenet: A Distributed Anonymous Information Storage and Retrieval System (2000) [pdf]

#72
post #69
post #63

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is what Freenet already provides with three different messaging systems and anonymously run indexes.

Are you aware of any YouTube-equivalent? Something that allows you to search user-generated/submitted content and content feeds and has a builtin player to display them.

I am aware that we are just one release away from serving video in a video-tag. That’s not as convenient as youtube (because it takes time to load), but much closer than before.

For convenience, we need m3u lists of video-chunks and a simple player shipped, since browsers cannot play m3u out of the box.

Re: Freenet: A Distributed Anonymous Information Storage and Retrieval System (2000) [pdf]

#73
post #65

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"it’s like a cache" is what we’ve been saying as the default description for years. When did you last interact with the freenet community?

> When did you last interact with the freenet community? When it was still relevant, i.e. a long time ago.

then you missed quite many changes
Post reply on HN