Live data from Hacker News

Tor: The Second-Generation Onion Router (2004)

svn.torproject.org

71–72 of 72 posts

Re: Tor: The Second-Generation Onion Router (2004)

#71
post #51

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Is there more info about active development? That site doesn't say much. I found some GitHub repos that were last updated in the summer[0]. It's going to be unfortunate if they stay with AGPL. 0 - https://github.com/orchidsource

(I am now in charge of technology at Orchid. None of that source code is relevant to our project. I am sorry for the confusion.) Can you explain why you are concerned with the usage of AGPL? Are you hoping to make a closed-source hosted fork eventually?

Hey j, we did work together in another life. I met brian fox at a conference in Boston earlier this year that he spoke at, but haven’t heard anything about Orchid since. Shoot me a note on Twitter in my profile if we could find time to chat.

Re: Tor: The Second-Generation Onion Router (2004)

#72

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Exit node, sure, but hosting a regular node should not pose any threat.

My impression is that TOR is exit node-constrained. Is this correct?

If you're using onion-site, exit nodes are not used at all, so it depends on your use-case. For accessing internet probably yes, exit-nodes are limiting factor.
Post reply on HN