Agreed. I don't think and article has made me feel so uncomfortable and wierded out for a while, if at all. Critically assessing someone in such a personal way is more than rude it is totally obnoxious. It verged from religious idolatry to deep psychoanalysis. And all of it based on stuff Patrick has posted online and nothing more. Sorry to rant, but I really disliked seeing that post voted up so much today and it is…
This sums up how I reacted to it as well. The post has a bizarre, obsessive, controlling creepiness to it. And seems not to really contain anything all that interesting. I'm glad I missed it when I looked at HN this morning.
I am not who you think I am
71–80 of 85 posts
Re: I am not who you think I am
#72Easily the most controversial thing I've ever written, but I'll stand up and be accounted for in my errors. I write once daily, every day, and I write honestly. Here, the mistake I made was not filtering my thought by another person who could feel ill because of it. I will explain my line of thinking, which does not excuse the large gaffe I made, but perhaps so people can understand my thinking. I've met a book edito…
I cringed a little bit while reading the latter part of your post, but I still stuck with "never attribute to malice . . .". I've wondered why giving folks the benefit of the doubt wasn't in the In Comments section of the guidelines (http://ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html).
I'd like to print your response and frame it as an example of how to own up to a mistake. I don't know you, but you sound like a very decent human being and you have my respect for what it's worth.
Re: I am not who you think I am
#73Easily the most controversial thing I've ever written, but I'll stand up and be accounted for in my errors. I write once daily, every day, and I write honestly. Here, the mistake I made was not filtering my thought by another person who could feel ill because of it. I will explain my line of thinking, which does not excuse the large gaffe I made, but perhaps so people can understand my thinking. I've met a book edito…
...it was my honest and well-intentioned thought... I know that. And I suspect that anyone who follows your writing here realizes that, too. I'll lay low for a while... Please don't. One of the memes constantly reinforced here at hn is pushing the envelope. How many times have we heard, "If you don't ruffle a few feathers, you're not pushing hard enough." You pushed. You ruffled. You learned. You stood up like a man.…
Re: I am not who you think I am
#74Re: I am not who you think I am
#75You can't ban somebody for their opinion
Are you joking? HN places great importance on preserving the tone of the community. If my opinion is that all the politicians are reptilians working to establish One World Government; and I comment on every post to that effect, and submit a new post every five minutes linking on my One World Government-watch blog; then I should be banned. That opinion is damaging to the community, and should not be allowed.
It amazes me that in this day and age, we still hear stuff like this.
It's not like he wrote "PATIO11 IS TEH SUXORS! FUK IM!!!". He wrote a long, thought out (perhaps not enough; besides the point) blog post and then decided to share that with the community ~ to which the community felt deserved the effort to respond to, one way or another.
Who are you to suggest that opinion is both unwanted and "damaging" to the community? If anything, suggesting that people only be allowed to certain criteria, methods and train of though is what is damaging and should not be allowed.
Re: I am not who you think I am
#76Earlier quoted context omitted.
Where you go off the track is using "should" rather than "could". Where the original went off track was in calling it a "tragedy".
In fact, he said "sick to my stomach", and "Seriously, I want to vomit". Extremely strong judgements going on there.
The guy who wrote that knows he could never be as good or make as much as Patio. That's why it's strongly worded.
Alas, tone and tongue-in-cheek are not grasped well when there is shock and awe.
Really I can't see why anyone would take it any other way, what with the intense praise he was giving him.
Re: I am not who you think I am
#77Easily the most controversial thing I've ever written, but I'll stand up and be accounted for in my errors. I write once daily, every day, and I write honestly. Here, the mistake I made was not filtering my thought by another person who could feel ill because of it. I will explain my line of thinking, which does not excuse the large gaffe I made, but perhaps so people can understand my thinking. I've met a book edito…
...it was my honest and well-intentioned thought... I know that. And I suspect that anyone who follows your writing here realizes that, too. I'll lay low for a while... Please don't. One of the memes constantly reinforced here at hn is pushing the envelope. How many times have we heard, "If you don't ruffle a few feathers, you're not pushing hard enough." You pushed. You ruffled. You learned. You stood up like a man.…
edw519, this is not by any means a personal attack on you and I admire your appreciation for the general value that this place gives you. But I gotta call this one out - sorry.
Reinforced. Really? How is this reinforced? In my experience pushing the envelope is barely tolerated, and then only if done superficially or regarding trivial issues.
For example, as another incarnation (yamada) I countered one of pg's "go forth and conquer, there's no risk" assertions back in I think april/may 07 with a simple post that a variety of macro variables were purposely allowed to develop in such a way by the powers that be that would result in a not-too-distant economic malaise that would be not only much larger than any recession any HN'rs had ever experienced, but also of a fundamentally different nature and so not lending itself to the standard and known (and thus immediately applicable) cures.
I even went out on a limb and said there was a very real possibility that the next 10 years or so for the U.S., once the S#$% hit the fan, may resemble Japan's lost decade (plus) since it fell apart in the 90s.
I put forth some verifiable things that would not take a rocket science intellect to connect into a likely scenario.
I got close to 100 karma points within hours (that being my first ever post) back when karma point accumulation algorithms didn't exist yet, only to watch all my karma magically disappear in tandem with pg issuing one-liner retorts to EACH and EVERY single comment I had made on any topic whatsoever on any day on any subject. They all disappeared.
Pushing the envelope? Seriously?
Seems obvious now, in retrospect.
But keep in mind I put this all out there in spring of 2007 before anyone here even heard of mortgage backed securities or credit default swaps or what have you.
I'd say that was pushing the envelope back in 07. You know, ahead of it actually happening.
What was reinforced for me? Nothing - my account was deleted. All because I held conflicting (and eventually to be proven correct) economic views of the near future.
Oh ... btw ... I won't name names but to the two gentlemen who referred to me as a "paranoid lunatic with baseless reasoning" and ... let's see ... what was it, a "quasi-logical conspiracy bot" ... how's the economy doing these days? Not so good? The government/industry rallying around to fix it? Ha! Told you so! Nya nya nya nya nya nya! Epic nya nya for me! Global, internationally-spanning nya nya for me! Worth more than all the karma points on HN combined!
Re: I am not who you think I am
#78Sir, with all due respect, kindly speak for yourself.
I find your post offensive to good sense, pragmatism, and sensibility.
If, and when a person chooses to share their lives with the entire world, they must then also live we the consequences of that sharing, good or bad.
Patio11 has done exactly this - he has quite literally given a piece of himself to the world and for that he has both been praised and psychoanalyzed. He is by all accounts an adult, and I am sure he is aware of the nature of this beast.
I enjoyed lionhearted's analysis, if only as an intellectual exercise. Is that not why this damn site exists? For the stimulation of intellectual curiosity? If this kind of post is not acceptable here, then by all reasonable measures 95% off all front page articles ever, do/did not belong here.
Where is this melodramatic over-reaction when the myriad of critical PG, Zuckerburg, Gates, Jobs, Hansen, Arrington, and Calcanis posts hit the front page? Why haven't the writers of those blog post been similarly singled out? Your needless "defense" of patio11 is more an affront to him then the post of which you disagree! If you're going to engage in high-school melodrama, at least be consistent about its application.
"Let's keep HN sacred."
HN isn't sacred for goodness-sakes. It is a place for intellectual discussion; the subject of which can be anything or anyone. Remove the 'sanctimonious' from your thinking - please.
Re: I am not who you think I am
#79Easily the most controversial thing I've ever written, but I'll stand up and be accounted for in my errors. I write once daily, every day, and I write honestly. Here, the mistake I made was not filtering my thought by another person who could feel ill because of it. I will explain my line of thinking, which does not excuse the large gaffe I made, but perhaps so people can understand my thinking. I've met a book edito…
The mistake, as in navel gazing, is thinking that any one cares what you think of another person's life choices. Especially the object of your attention.
Bingo card guy seems happy (enough) to me.
Perhaps a better approach would have been to initiate a dialog, gently asking him for his input on some of your big sky ideas, subtly encouraging him to raise his aim. In the process, you'd maybe make a friend, and probably learn why he's made the choices he has. I know nothing about bingo card man, but imagine he's the primary care giver for a child or relative. Given a situation like that, I'd say he's a fucking genius for making some side money for comparatively little effort.
In summation, chill dude. You spouted off. Wasn't personal. The haters will always be hating. So fuck 'em.
Re: I am not who you think I am
#80Easily the most controversial thing I've ever written, but I'll stand up and be accounted for in my errors. I write once daily, every day, and I write honestly. Here, the mistake I made was not filtering my thought by another person who could feel ill because of it. I will explain my line of thinking, which does not excuse the large gaffe I made, but perhaps so people can understand my thinking. I've met a book edito…
I don't buy that. Your writing on your blog is juvenile, unorganized and generally a pain to read. Your style here is better. Nothing on your blog would attract a book editor or a literary agent.
"For my part, I hold no ill will for people, even ones who said horrible things, and my door is still always open to people who need a hand."
You are a narcissist of the worst kind. No one here wants or needs your hand. Stop writing from a position of imaginary superiority.
How many titles do you need to prop up your self image anyway? From your meta tags:
Sebastian Marshall: Strategist, scientist, entrepreneur, technologist, writer. Servant of the strong and virtuous, a visage of hell and misery to the rabidly mediocre.
One title is lacking: Professional Blowhard.