The critical difference is that in China, the apps effectively are the banks, whereas in the US, regulatory capture ensures that the banks stay the banks and it's the app's problem to figure out how to interface with them. The reason the banks are scared is not because "banks" are not involved. They're scared because these apps have successfully vertically integrated to become banks. This is the logical next step for…
>They're scared because these apps have successfully vertically integrated to become banks. I'm not sure tech companies really want the core banking business, which is to lend money (taking on credit risk in the process) funded by deposits. I can imagine Amazon doing it for smaller consumer purchases as they know their customers well. But who will make loans to SMEs and larger retail loans? Google and Apple? I doubt…
http://money.cnn.com/2017/02/22/investing/atm-overdraft-fees...
And check out page 38 of BoA's annual report: http://media.corporate-ir.net/media_files/IROL/71/71595/BOAM...
Interest income was $44.7 billion, non interest income (aka fees, trading, and services) was 42.6 billion.