I have a couple of questions - Do you have a team implementing most of the new state-of-the-art model architectures (given how fast new ones keep getting published)? If so, I'm assuming you keep associating some types of model architectures to the type of data being input? I'm just curious how you'd pick a particular architecture. On the other hand, AutoML comes to mind, but IMO, the biggest hurdle of AutoML, and its…
Thanks! One of the benefits of Lobe is that users who build models from scratch can publish and share to use in other documents, like a community model zoo. We do this for the current architectures internally, but the goal is for the community to help keep up with the firehose state-of-the-art in ML. Something really interesting we have discussed for a future feature is being able to train a model using the data of w…
Lobe – Deep Learning Made Simple
71–74 of 74 posts
Re: Lobe – Deep Learning Made Simple
#72Awesome work and I hope to see the product grow!
Re: Lobe – Deep Learning Made Simple
#73This looks AMAZING! I love the UX approach to balancing simplicity and complexity. For instance, giving the granular control over the hyper-parameters in a visual way with immediate feedback is a whole level above any other design I've seen out there that tries to make deep learning more accessible. Awesome work and I hope to see the product grow!
Re: Lobe – Deep Learning Made Simple
#74Do you support transfer-learning, for instance, pre-trained models on ImageNet? A lot of problems have limited dataset, and can only work by training the last layers of a pre-trained model?
And do you support training on cloud-based public datasets? Uploading a large public dataset doesn't make much sense.
Really looking forward to trying your platform!