Live data from Hacker News

Shotcut: Free, open source, cross-platform video editor

shotcutapp.com

71–80 of 141 posts

Re: Shotcut: Free, open source, cross-platform video editor

#71
post #27

I would like to have a simple free video editor that can cut and append files together without re-encoding. It's doable with avidemux, but it is just pain to manage.

I wrote one. It's actually a script driven by a video player that prints timestamps on standard out for specific keystrokes, along with a bunch of key combos for jumping back and forth, frame by frame if required. Ffmpeg is invoked at the end to cut the bits out and string them together, using 'copy' codecs.

Works well for the mp4 streams from my helmet camera, reliable key frames etc. For video that's been more highly compressed you'll need to compromise on the cut points if you want to avoid reencoding. And the cuts are abrupt, no fades or transitions.

Re: Shotcut: Free, open source, cross-platform video editor

#72

Shotcut (on Linux at least) just doesn't work. I've used pretty much all amateur video-making software for Windows and some for Mac, Screenflow, FinalCut Pro, etc. The best by far is FinalCut Pro (Mac-only), because it automatically creates proxy files and allows you to edit everything in real time with no lag, even when adding complicated effects. The situation on Linux is dismal. The only good one is https://kdenli…

Another paid Apple astroturfer.

Re: Shotcut: Free, open source, cross-platform video editor

#73
post #28

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I do some video editing contract work from time to time. I never know what I will have to use so I have pretty much used all of them. They are unstable because they require huge amount of resources, especially if your looking for 4k source material. You must have a very powerful machine. I don't have many crashes when working on high end custom built machines, but they do happen. From most stable to least stable for…

> Adobe Premier - This thing is a BEAST but it is the defacto standard. I must admit, I've not really heard of Adobe being used in professional editing contexts. With a little research I've found some articles suggesting the BBC was standardising on Adobe Premiere[1]. Article is from 2010, but I can't confirm that happened though. I left that organisation in 2011 and at that time, I was managing a number of Mac based…

Just one data point and my usage may not be "pro" the way broadcast or film would be (I've done mainly in-house educational videos for a couple of universities).

We went from Avid in the early/mid 2000's to Final Cut Pro on Mac Pros (in the cheese grater days) to Premiere Pro on Windows workstations which I still use today. First we switched away from FCP when Mac Pros languished and FCPX tossed out a lot of the features we needed. I understand that a lot of those were later replaced but at the time it was a dealbreaker.

With Premiere, we can edit on either MacOS or Windows workstations, performance is good on a properly equipped machine, and it integrates well with the other tools in the suite like Audition, After Effects, and their still-image stuff like Photoshop and Illustrator when needed.

It's not going to work for everyone and I'm still not a fan of the subscription model (much prefer the old way where I'd spend $600 or whatever every few years and be done with it). That said, it doesn't surprise me to see it getting professional use, just as it doesn't surprise me that other production houses find FCPX to be a better fit for their equipment and workflow.

Re: Shotcut: Free, open source, cross-platform video editor

#74

Shotcut (on Linux at least) just doesn't work. I've used pretty much all amateur video-making software for Windows and some for Mac, Screenflow, FinalCut Pro, etc. The best by far is FinalCut Pro (Mac-only), because it automatically creates proxy files and allows you to edit everything in real time with no lag, even when adding complicated effects. The situation on Linux is dismal. The only good one is https://kdenli…

I share the same frustrations but I think honestly at this point Davinci Resolve 14 is the best video editor for Linux - nothing really competes. It is a bit of resource hog, but they have added a ton of capability in the last few years in regard to non-linear editing and I think if you seriously need to edit video on Linux that is where you should be looking. Also it's free. https://www.blackmagicdesign.com/products…

I'm a marketing sucker, I'll admit it, and this looks amazing, and it's free.

Re: Shotcut: Free, open source, cross-platform video editor

#75
post #49
post #45

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Where would you rate Movie Maker, and where would you rate Premiere Pro? Shotcut and Kdenlive are fundamentally video editors, which happen to be able to do screen recording. Camtasia is specifically a screen recorder.

Camtasia is much more than a screen recorder. Look at a couple of Youtube videos on Camtasia 9. It is a full fledged editor (and also does audio / video recording too). That's the winning property of it. You just click a button to start recording, deliver your video content, press stop and then you can immediately start editing your content. Then you export and you're done. With something like premiere you would have…

> Camtasia is much more than a screen recorder.

Sure, but fundamentally, Camtasia is a screen recorder. It's purpose is to make screencasts. If you were editing video filmed with a camera, you would find Kdenlive, Premiere etc. more useful than Camtasia.

Re: Shotcut: Free, open source, cross-platform video editor

#77

Shotcut (on Linux at least) just doesn't work. I've used pretty much all amateur video-making software for Windows and some for Mac, Screenflow, FinalCut Pro, etc. The best by far is FinalCut Pro (Mac-only), because it automatically creates proxy files and allows you to edit everything in real time with no lag, even when adding complicated effects. The situation on Linux is dismal. The only good one is https://kdenli…

Did you try Lightworks[0]? No affiliation with the company, i'm just curious how it compares with the others.

[0] https://www.lwks.com/

Re: Shotcut: Free, open source, cross-platform video editor

#78
post #76

I'm currently doing all my editing in iMovie and I'm not very happy with it since it has a few glitches I frequently run into. Anybody got a link to a comparison between this and iMovie? "Shortcut" seems to be quite ungoogleable.

The name is 'shotcut' but I definitely read it as 'shortcut' the first time too

Re: Shotcut: Free, open source, cross-platform video editor

#79
Being a hobby blender user i have used many Video editing softwares but i keep coming back to blender as my one stop shop for everything. Effects, Video Editing, Sound sync.. Other editors i use are KDenlive, Pitivi, Openshot and lesser known VLMC from the creators of VLC player.

Re: Shotcut: Free, open source, cross-platform video editor

#80

Shotcut (on Linux at least) just doesn't work. I've used pretty much all amateur video-making software for Windows and some for Mac, Screenflow, FinalCut Pro, etc. The best by far is FinalCut Pro (Mac-only), because it automatically creates proxy files and allows you to edit everything in real time with no lag, even when adding complicated effects. The situation on Linux is dismal. The only good one is https://kdenli…

I share the same frustrations but I think honestly at this point Davinci Resolve 14 is the best video editor for Linux - nothing really competes. It is a bit of resource hog, but they have added a ton of capability in the last few years in regard to non-linear editing and I think if you seriously need to edit video on Linux that is where you should be looking. Also it's free. https://www.blackmagicdesign.com/products…

No h264 / h265 import on Linux though, which is a shame as that's pretty much what all consumer cameras produce.
Post reply on HN