Live data from Hacker News

Here's why you should not buy a Drobo

jan.rychter.com

71–74 of 74 posts

Re: Here's why you should not buy a Drobo

#71
A couple of years ago when I was looking for a NAS for our office the choice was between a Drobo and ReadyNAS from Netgear. Although Drobo had so many recommendations and good feedback I thought I'd rather go with a weller-known company like Netgear. The ReadyNas isn't the greatest but solid, quite fast and reliable. I'm happy about the decision.

We're increasingly using our own custom debian linux box now with SMB shares, backups with duplicity, Apache / Lighty and so on. It just allows for more flexibility.

Re: Here's why you should not buy a Drobo

#72
post #7

I'm running Nexenta / Solaris zfs with samba, but it supports accented characters just fine. Perhaps this is a limitation of Mac smb support. zfs also doesn't have a repairing fsck as far as I know, but I have more faith in its monitoring and scrubbing features. It also bulk reads and writes at about 100mbytes a second, approaching the limit of gigabit ethernet.

You can have it check the filesystem while it is online, by using "zpool scrub poolname" - it will go through and check all the ECC'd bits and then attempt to fix it if possible.

You can then run "zpool status" and it will display the last time each pool was scrubbed, and show you the number of errors if any.

Re: Here's why you should not buy a Drobo

#73
Hello, Mark from Drobo here.

First, I'm sorry for the troubles the original poster (Jan Rychter) has had. I don't have any first hand knowledge of his use, and can't find a support case on it -- has it been escalated by our European team back to the factory? Please send me your case # (via direct message at drobospace where you are a member) and I will escalate if necessary.

The Drobo/DroboShare combination has a binary user experience. Those with no prior network storage experience love it, those with prior experience want more functionality and performance. Providing more performance is the goal of the Drobo FS, a single box solution for sharing via AFP or SMB. Third party DroboApps provide web, ftp, rsync, NFS, and other protocols. This box is 4x faster than the Drobo/Droboshare owing to eliminating USB as an interconnect, and faster generation of ARM processors.

Mark Fuccio

Re: Here's why you should not buy a Drobo

#74
Excellent thread. I was very close to buying a Drobo several days ago, but chose not to. There are many excellent advantages to it. But two main reasons pushed me away:

1) Encrypted logs. I think it is crucial to have readable log files to be able to understand what is happening with the drive array. If there is proprietary information that the company wishes to be protect, I welcome them to do so. There should be two files: one which is plaintext with the major status and event messages, and one which is encrypted with their proprietary information. Rolling the plaintext log into the encrypted log seems like a user-hostile posture.

2) Maintenance costs. If the log files are encrypted, then when the array fails (not "if", "when") then I will need to buy drobocare ($129) to get them to read the logfile to tell me what happened. I expect to keep this array running for the next 4-6 years, and I am not willing to buy ongoing yearly maintenance ($250/three years) just find out how the array is doing.

Like I said, I was hours away from ordering a drive, I really like the simplicity of the design, but thanks to some of the comments on this thread I suddenly realized that I would signing up for years of maintenance fees. That's not what I wanted.

Post reply on HN