Live data from Hacker News

Safari 5

apple.com

71–80 of 81 posts

Re: Safari 5

#71
post #2

I work for a large newspaper, and we're not very amused by the built-in "Reader" (removes ads and crud, like Readability): http://www.apple.com/safari/whats-new.html ... for users, it looks like a good feature though.

If your site is designed well and respects your users, they'll have no reason to ever engage Safari 5's Reader on your site.

It fixes the "I want to read this, but it's hard to read" problem. If you don't have that problem, your users won't use Reader.

Re: Safari 5

#72
post #26

So the default search engine is Bing. Interesting...

The default search engine is still Google – it’s just that you now can also switch search engines and also pick Yahoo as well as Bing (that’s the order in which they appear in the list). They just heavily advertise this new option with a huge image [1], ordinarily a feature like that would get a line or two of text or maybe not even be mentioned. I guess that’s supposed to send a message to Google, something like “We…

They already offered Yahoo as an option. It's specifically Bing that's new.

Re: Safari 5

#73
post #56

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I also want to present the counter viewppoint - http://arstechnica.com/business/news/2010/03/why-ad-blocking... Newspapers were dying because nobody wanted to pay for news, which they could get for free at Google News. Newspapers were told to suck it up and instead move online - to an ad supported model. No more ads. I dont think the newspapers are the bad guy here.

I would uninstall my ad blocking extensions if, and this is a big if, advertisers wouldn't abuse their privilege for me to see their ad. How do they abuse it? By authoring blinking and moving ads that are unbelievably annoying. Everyone once in a while I disable AdBlock, only to flee back to turn it on within a few hours. I'm sorry, but WTF are they smoking?

I use Opera's content-blocking function, which allows me to nuke just a specific ad, or a specific part of a page. If something truly incenses me, I kill it. I think this is how ad blocking should work in general, given that most ads are benign.

Re: Safari 5

#74
post #70

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I too love well written articles. But it is unlikely a big enough market to entertain that many newspapers. I do however have quibbles with the idea of unbiased journalism. Personally I prefer highly opinionated pieces, but that's another discussion :)

This is a distressingly common sentiment these days. I can't think of any good reason to prefer opinionated screeds to well-balanced factual analysis. Very often it boils down to "I don't have confidence in news stories to have a 100% optimal distribution and analysis of the facts, so I've decided it's not even worth pursuing the truth."

Opinionated does not mean that it's not balanced or factual.

Everything is at the end of the day interpretation. I would rather know what peoples stance are whether I agree or disagree than to read something that is stated as the truth.

Re: Safari 5

#75
post #47
post #27

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It shouldn't be very to hard to generate a list of running apps that link against the updated libs and ask the user for permission to restart them... Or let the user ignore it at own peril.

Almost everything is (potentially) linked against WebKit (At least judging by how broken my system when a rogue rogue flash plugin broke webkit.). Certainly Finder, for example. It could just get away with enforcing log off/log on again, but if multiple users are logged in it is probably simpler just to restart. "Ignoring at their own peril" will almost certainly result in horrible crashes.

Why would there be crashes? The running apps will keep their already loaded binary until they're restarted.

Maybe there'll be some bugs in handling shared on-disk resources (cache, and maybe something else?), but I doubt that those parts change very often. That would be a reasonable reason to require a reboot, but unless those parts actually change it should be avoided.

Re: Safari 5

#76
post #70

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is a distressingly common sentiment these days. I can't think of any good reason to prefer opinionated screeds to well-balanced factual analysis. Very often it boils down to "I don't have confidence in news stories to have a 100% optimal distribution and analysis of the facts, so I've decided it's not even worth pursuing the truth."

Opinionated does not mean that it's not balanced or factual. Everything is at the end of the day interpretation. I would rather know what peoples stance are whether I agree or disagree than to read something that is stated as the truth.

Something opinionated is by definition not balanced (in the sense of giving everything an equal shake) or factual. "Fact" and "opinion" are antonyms. And I can't imagine what it would look like for an article to be opinionated but not explicitly favor any particular view over another.

Are we using different definitions here or do you genuinely believe somebody arguing that Steve Jobs is a worthless sonovabitch is being evenhanded?

Re: Safari 5

#78
post #42

There are a few extensions here: http://safariextensions.tumblr.com/

I'm loving the 'BuiltWith' extension, to explore the technology stacks used by websites. That will certainly come in handy. http://blog.builtwith.com/index.php/2010/06/08/builtwith-saf...

Yeah, it could use some prettification but it's interesting, I had never heard of it before.

Re: Safari 5

#80
post #76

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Opinionated does not mean that it's not balanced or factual. Everything is at the end of the day interpretation. I would rather know what peoples stance are whether I agree or disagree than to read something that is stated as the truth.

Something opinionated is by definition not balanced (in the sense of giving everything an equal shake) or factual. "Fact" and "opinion" are antonyms. And I can't imagine what it would look like for an article to be opinionated but not explicitly favor any particular view over another. Are we using different definitions here or do you genuinely believe somebody arguing that Steve Jobs is a worthless sonovabitch is bei…

We are perhaps using different definitions.
Post reply on HN