71–80 of 88 posts
RankScience automates split-testing for SEO to grow organic search traffic for businesses. 80% of clicks from Google go to organic results and yet most companies don't know how to improve their SEO, or can't effectively measure their efforts to do so. Because of the scale of SEO and the constant change of both Google's ranking algorithm and your competitors' SEO campaigns, the only way to succeed in the long-run is w…
RankScience automates split-testing for SEO to grow organic search traffic for businesses. 80% of clicks from Google go to organic results and yet most companies don't know how to improve their SEO, or can't effectively measure their efforts to do so. Because of the scale of SEO and the constant change of both Google's ranking algorithm and your competitors' SEO campaigns, the only way to succeed in the long-run is w…
How does your pricing work? Do you have a free tier?
You guys mention < 25ms as the performance hit of having you guys in front of the client's application. Is there a more concrete SLA you guys provide? Do you have a sense of what that hit might cost in page rank (there's some theories out there that time to first byte is one of the features that search engines reward)?
I consult with startups and tech companies (recently: SurveyMonkey) on SEO, so this is super-interesting... especially the automated aspect, which is pretty novel in this space. What are some of the specific types of automated tests that you run?
Here's a case study with a simple example of a test: https://www.rankscience.com/coderwall-seo-split-test * CTR on titles/meta descriptions * Any HTML changes * Design changes * Time on site
E.g., in the CoderWall example, is it propagating of the title tag change to all the pages in the test group that's "automated"?
At least to my ears, "automated" suggests that there are tests that are selected and run completely without human intervention. (Which is hard to imagine in the SEO space.) Is that in any way accurate?
When you are just starting out with a website, what is the 20% of effort that leads to 80% of the results in regard to SEO?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Here's a case study with a simple example of a test: https://www.rankscience.com/coderwall-seo-split-test * CTR on titles/meta descriptions * Any HTML changes * Design changes * Time on site
Thanks for the reply. Would you mind being more specific about what specific aspects of the "automated" tests are "automated"? E.g., in the CoderWall example, is it propagating of the title tag change to all the pages in the test group that's "automated"? At least to my ears, "automated" suggests that there are tests that are selected and run completely without human intervention. (Which is hard to imagine in the SEO…