Live data from Hacker News

Amazon LightSail: Simple Virtual Private Servers on AWS

amazonlightsail.com

71–80 of 631 posts

Re: Amazon LightSail: Simple Virtual Private Servers on AWS

#71
This seems like a great option for a utility server for existing AWS customers. With VPC peering you get free and fast transfer between one of these and your existing AWS infrastructure, but in a nice one-price VPS.

I also wouldn't be too surprised to see some people using these as middle-man boxes to reduce transfer costs associated with EC2 - $5 for 1TB is darned cheap for AWS. Using one of these to back up data from some EC2 hosts would be a win.

Re: Amazon LightSail: Simple Virtual Private Servers on AWS

#72

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Right but one of those 3 (linode) has been pretty brutally hacked (a number of times, at the control plane level) while DO & AWS have a different security story.

True, but that is a little exaggerated. Yes, they were hacked in the past (over a year ago); one of their small data centers went down. Their US East center has been solid for the past 8 months that I have been using, no hiccups.

wow... 8 months? Not being able to get in to your servers for days at a time is not "a little exaggerated".

It was less than a year ago - 11 months. December in to January, Linode data centers, but especially Atlanta, were heavily attacked.

https://blog.linode.com/2016/01/29/christmas-ddos-retrospect...

There was another moderate attack a few months ago.

Caused no end of headache for some clients of mine.

I like Linode, and have used them for some projects in the past, but there are more options now.

Re: Amazon LightSail: Simple Virtual Private Servers on AWS

#73
post #9

This is the first cheap bandwidth option I've seen on AWS. Transferring 1TB out of S3 or EC2 is costs about $90, but is included in a $5 server with Lightsail.

Looks like you can spin up three of these instances as a proxy and pay $15 for 3 TB of bandwidth from AWS.

Is the transfer from the aws instances to the lightsail instances not billed if in the save data center?

Re: Amazon LightSail: Simple Virtual Private Servers on AWS

#75
post #39
post #17

I hate to deviate from the topic, but... is the guy on the front page wearing a red cape?

Are you saying you don't wear a superhero outfit when you're coding??

I wear a supervillain outfit. Goatee, white lab coat, menacing laugh.

Re: Amazon LightSail: Simple Virtual Private Servers on AWS

#76
With how versatile the AWS ecosystem is and the quality of the Amazon brand this has the potential to absolutely demolish most of the small time VPS providers. Unless you provide a niche such as DDoS protection or PCI/HIPAA compliant hosting I do not see how you can compete for legitimate customers.

Re: Amazon LightSail: Simple Virtual Private Servers on AWS

#78
post #68
post #33

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't think that actually holds up. There are certainly some people that want "ironclad guarantees", but the reality of cost here is pretty close: you pay $5/mo max for the server. The things that can cost more are either overages on bandwidth/dns (and here, 1TB of bandwidth on the low end is included, eliminating a lot of the flux from EC2), or things you choose to initiate, like snapshots. It feels like the large…

I personally don't use AWS for personal projects because of the lack of a cap. I would rather see my system suspended rather than continue to pay beyond my budget.

This. I got excited about this until I came to HN and started reading the comments. I _have_ to have a cap. I don't want to do something stupid that puts me on the hook for $$$.

Re: Amazon LightSail: Simple Virtual Private Servers on AWS

#79

Just to be clear: This service is offered by Amazon/AWS themselves, it isn't a third party. That's a question I had when I first clicked, which is why I am answering it here. One big "gotcha" for AWS newbies which I cannot tell if this addresses: Does this set or allow the user to set a cost ceiling? AWS have offered billing alerts since forever. They'll also occasionally refund unexpected expenses (one time thing).…

Also, if you have a Static IP attached to the VPS and you first Stop, and then Destroy your instance, you will need to make sure you "free" the IP as well to avoid _small_ 0.005/hr price. From FAQ: > What do Lightsail static IPs cost? > They're free in Lightsail, as long as you are using them! You don't pay for a static IP if it is attached to an instance. Public IPs are a scarce resource and Lightsail is committed t…

> $0.005/hour

That's $3.60/month... seems similar to mail-in rebates—many people forget, and accidentally give Amazon some (mostly) free money.

Also, from later in this thread:

> FWIW, bandwidth overages at Linode and DO are $0.02 per GB, LightSail is $0.09.

It's these seemingly-tiny (but not-so-tiny when I'm running 60-70 VPSes) costs that kill when you get your first bill after a large traffic event.

Re: Amazon LightSail: Simple Virtual Private Servers on AWS

#80
post #25

I'm amused by the model they have in their banner: a bearded, tattooed man wearing what appears to be a .. cape? We've come a long way since the stock photos of 'smiling super-normal people wearing ties, huddled around a computer'.

Not to mention the man is wearing on-ear headphones and is using a smartphone in front of his laptop, which seems more common today than ever.
Post reply on HN