Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's a float value.
The funny part is that you're getting downvoted when it's actually defined as a float. Like, you weren't kidding. They honestly made it a float. What.
Stalking your Facebook friends on Tinder
71–80 of 112 posts
Re: Stalking your Facebook friends on Tinder
#72Re: Stalking your Facebook friends on Tinder
#73Can confirm the new Tinder Social feature is opt in, with reasonable warning: https://imgur.com/ie8IgSZ Feature can be disabled at any time.
The feature will also opt-in (on android at least) via a notification, with no confirmation upon opening the notification. Thanks, anti-privacy patterns!
Re: Stalking your Facebook friends on Tinder
#74How can I tell if I've even been opted in? Bastards. I'm a paying customer and they pull this crap.
It's OPT-IN - you can tell because you would have said 'opt me in to Tinder Social'. Also, if you can remember, swipe to your profile screen. If you have opted in it has it in huge writing.
Re: Stalking your Facebook friends on Tinder
#75Earlier quoted context omitted.
Are there more than two genders now?
Yes, and I'm not sure why he's getting downvoted. This is a legitimate Facebook feature. Gender can be either Male, Female, or Custom, and Facebook gives you the option to choose which gender pronouns you prefer. Thus, to see it represented as a boolean is unusual. I'm curious as to what the value of that field is when a user has chosen Facebook's custom gender display options.
Re: Stalking your Facebook friends on Tinder
#76Do I have to create an App featuring access to my friend list for that?
Re: Stalking your Facebook friends on Tinder
#77Re: Stalking your Facebook friends on Tinder
#78Re: Stalking your Facebook friends on Tinder
#79Can't get it to work ... where do I get my facebook user id and token from? Do I have to create an App featuring access to my friend list for that?
Re: Stalking your Facebook friends on Tinder
#80I love security posts like this. His previous one about facebook messenger status was also really nicely done. He doesn't succumb to the temptation to be abusive (to either the people who made the thing he's testing, the people reading, or anyone who might be impacted by it), which is something a lot of security researchers seem to find impossible to avoid; there's a lot of calling people various forms of stupid in m…
The overall technical outline of the issue and what he did to figure it out are clear — and certainly interesting — but I am having a hard time reading the blog post. This writing style is exhausting to me. Instead of reading normally I find myself skipping more and more text to get to the bits that aren't silly jokes and internet slang. A shame, because it hides the technical insights he has. At least he's not inser…