There are many areas the article does not cover, but this is expected when writing space is limited. Main areas that I feel need more coverage...
1) The community itself, it is overwhelming to see how much work has been done by people in their spare time. Many of these developers go unnamed and provide some amazing work - I would not be able to complete my app without this community, I'm just putting the puzzle of community work together and filling in the blanks where needed.
2) Access to tech, it is almost insulting to see how may Diabetics cannot access Pumps and CGMs, or can access one and not the other. The cost for such systems and limited access is not justified.
3) Why, when we do own the required tech purchased from our own money do we then have to "hack" such devices to access the data that they have about MY body!?
4) The dangers of the community work, this is no riskier I say than commercial systems but this subject must be openly discussed in the community to be sure we understand and limit possible risks
5) I agree with the comments about glucagon, this should ideally be a worse case treatment. Why do we need a system that can provide glucagon when early alerts from an APS can notify the patient that a carb treatment is needed. Let's stop trying to find a 100% solution and produce something that covers 60% of our needs now