Earlier quoted context omitted.
I usually use the command line for Android work, with emacs. But people demand IDEs these days. So here we are.
Any chance you feel up to sharing? I've been wanting to get into Android dev work, but I'm staunchly a CLI guy, and I've had a hard time trying to figure out the IDEs Google keeps pushing out. Not to mention the obscene sizes of these damn IDEs.
Android Studio 2.0 Is Google’s New, Improved Development Suite
71–78 of 78 posts
Re: Android Studio 2.0 Is Google’s New, Improved Development Suite
#72Earlier quoted context omitted.
For several months XCode would just crash when I tried to run my application with debugging. It was eventually fixed by an XCode update. I think the only large platform owning company that has really succeeded with development tools is Microsoft. With Microsoft's newfound interest in cross platform development I'm looking forward to the day when I can just develop entirely in Visual Studio.
> With Microsoft's newfound interest in cross platform development I'm looking forward to the day when I can just develop entirely in Visual Studio. Agreed, VS is the best IDE out there by far. Still a shame that developing in VS implies developing on Windows.
Fairly limited without ReSharper, which makes it slow; language support is not particularly great; updates have made me lose half a day's producitvity (although that's par for the course for Windows); weird keybinds...
And of course: Windows-only, not open source and not free as in free beer either if you don't meet certain criteria.
Re: Android Studio 2.0 Is Google’s New, Improved Development Suite
#73What's wrong with a sane makefile oriented thing with a small tool chain and letting the user pick the editor/IDE? Why does every large company build out this ridiculous IDE for their product?
Re: Android Studio 2.0 Is Google’s New, Improved Development Suite
#74Earlier quoted context omitted.
I doubt you have tried Android Studio support for NDK versus Eclipse CDT.
Your assumptions are incorrect, and rather offensive.
Cause man, I'll tell you straight up, I despise Eclipse. To the marrow of my bones. But if you wanna do native debugging, they're it. Native debugging is very important when you're getting nasty (and if you're not getting nasty, for the love of god why would you use the NDK?!).
Re: Android Studio 2.0 Is Google’s New, Improved Development Suite
#75Earlier quoted context omitted.
I usually use the command line for Android work, with emacs. But people demand IDEs these days. So here we are.
Any chance you feel up to sharing? I've been wanting to get into Android dev work, but I'm staunchly a CLI guy, and I've had a hard time trying to figure out the IDEs Google keeps pushing out. Not to mention the obscene sizes of these damn IDEs.
android is rather cli friendly - a full 50% of the devs I know use vim or emacs.
Re: Android Studio 2.0 Is Google’s New, Improved Development Suite
#76However, it appears to still require the experimental Gradle plug-in. Which, frankly, isn't very good.
I'm still building my native .so separately using NDK build. I don't get any native code debugging either.
Is there something obvious I'm missing?
Re: Android Studio 2.0 Is Google’s New, Improved Development Suite
#77Re: Android Studio 2.0 Is Google’s New, Improved Development Suite
#78Earlier quoted context omitted.
For several months XCode would just crash when I tried to run my application with debugging. It was eventually fixed by an XCode update. I think the only large platform owning company that has really succeeded with development tools is Microsoft. With Microsoft's newfound interest in cross platform development I'm looking forward to the day when I can just develop entirely in Visual Studio.
Worked as a .net dev for ~3 years, and I loved VS, but it had its share of random problems too. I remember it flipping out and suddenly consuming a shitload of CPU and RAM for no apparent reason, even working on fairly small projects. It was nearly impossible to work with it until I switched to a more powerful PC. Is it really fair to say xCode is not a successful tool? A lot of people use it, and I don't hear enough…
however it is so baffling that in several conferences I have seen Googlers ask such persons to come forward and explain to them why they don't want to switch.