Live data from Hacker News

GitHub contribution graph can be harmful to contributors

github.com

71–80 of 120 posts

Re: GitHub contribution graph can be harmful to contributors

#71

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What do you mean it encourages people to not have weekends? Spending 20 mins fixing a small bug or improving docs in your for-fun project isn't giving up your weekend.

The "weekend" people mean here is a period of time when you do not do work at all

Is it uncommon to do some free software work in your spare time? I usually have a bunch of things I want to fix and spend an hour or two during the weekend when I would normally be just watching YouTube.

Re: GitHub contribution graph can be harmful to contributors

#72
post #66

Everybody should know that working on free software in general is not healthy. :) There is no way that the fame, name recognition in the community, gratefulness received, CV padding or whatever makes up for your hours of free work. The time investment wont pay off. BUT if it is the act of writing code you like, then that doesn't matter. The "work" itself is the reward.

> Everybody should know that working on free software in general is not healthy. :) There is no way that the fame, name recognition in the community, gratefulness received, CV padding or whatever makes up for your hours of free work. The time investment wont pay off.

How about personal satisfaction? That's definitely worth a lot. Not to mention that I got my first job from free software contributions alone. That's also worth something and did pay off (of course that's not why I contributed to free software).

Re: GitHub contribution graph can be harmful to contributors

#73
post #71

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The "weekend" people mean here is a period of time when you do not do work at all

Is it uncommon to do some free software work in your spare time? I usually have a bunch of things I want to fix and spend an hour or two during the weekend when I would normally be just watching YouTube.

"Free time" is when you do it, sure. The point is that you are not a machine and probably should not be working on code every single day.

Re: GitHub contribution graph can be harmful to contributors

#74
post #71

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The "weekend" people mean here is a period of time when you do not do work at all

Is it uncommon to do some free software work in your spare time? I usually have a bunch of things I want to fix and spend an hour or two during the weekend when I would normally be just watching YouTube.

> Is it uncommon to do some free software work in your spare time?

No. But life for many people consists of more things than just software development.

Re: GitHub contribution graph can be harmful to contributors

#75
post #2

Is this an April Fools joke? I've never seen anyone who gave a fuck about their contribution graph and record streak, except for devs who developped clever git repos that make your contribution graph show pixel art (which is pretty awesome). I want to say if you feel pressure when looking at your contribution graph, it's all in your head and you should take a break because you're clearly not thinking straight.

GitHub is totally over thinking this. I barely notice the social networking aspects of GH.

Re: GitHub contribution graph can be harmful to contributors

#77
My response on Github:

I haven't made my first commit to a public Github however, it seems to me you can easily keep your streak with minimal effort. Why not just stash a small commit during the week and have a cronjob commit it for you on Saturday and another Sunday?

Re: GitHub contribution graph can be harmful to contributors

#78
post #42

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I agree that it's a largely irrelevant / frivolous feature, and if someone cares deeply about it, it's likely a sign of some deeper psychological issue. But deeper psychological issues are real, and gamification definitely pushes a certain agenda. When that agenda (in this case "streaks" and "commits per day") isn't really serving a community, it would be sensible for the community to tweak those rules. Putting some…

I've had interviewers ask me why I had certain gaps in my contribution graph before. Sometimes from large, successful tech companies that are widely sought after for jobs.

Perhaps it was more of a personality test to see how you would answer and not them caring about gaps. Maybe they were seeing if you would come up with a crazy excuse and get defensive. Just a thought.

Edit - It is interesting without knowing intention people say to pass on the employeer. How many interviewers ask stupid questions not realizing they might miss out on a great hire? I think often companies forget that we are interviewing them as well. At any rate I think it's fair to ask in the interviewer why they are asking the question or what is their concern. Especially if the question already made you decide to turn down any offers.

Re: GitHub contribution graph can be harmful to contributors

#79
Even though this may just be an April Fool's joke. My 2 cents.

This is a "give a man a fish" solution that doesn't address the root cause of the issue (and that parable is all about fixing root causes). This likely has more to do with the inability of some individuals to create personal boundaries and regulate their own behaviours than it does with the presence of an infographic. That individual inability will still be around even if the infographic goes away, because as in the parable if you don't fix the root cause the other person is in the same situation again tomorrow.

Re: GitHub contribution graph can be harmful to contributors

#80

My response on Github: I haven't made my first commit to a public Github however, it seems to me you can easily keep your streak with minimal effort. Why not just stash a small commit during the week and have a cronjob commit it for you on Saturday and another Sunday?

Because now you're gaming the system. If the incentives put in place by the system are so perverse that the best advice is to -- for lack of a better word -- "cheat", then the incentives need to be changed.
Post reply on HN