Earlier quoted context omitted.
How could it have been? It wasn’t like they had machine guns. In best case I believe it takes something like a full minute to reload a musket. Zerg rush would be sufficient tactics. 100 yard dash means your hoard of unarmed natives is through the musket range in maybe 10-15 seconds and pulling limbs off the spaniards already. Why this wasn’t done is I think the big mystery and lends credence to the idea of spaniards…
Don't forget horses, armor, and steel weapons. It seems like Incan weapons had a lot of trouble penetrating Spanish armor, while the reverse was not true. Also, the Incas didn't just lack cavalry; they lacked the weapons and tactics to counter cavalry (such as pike formations.) That said, I was thinking of the Battle of Cajamarca, which was actually a Spanish ambush. 100x was probably overstating it; under other circ…
AI Will Be Met with Violence, and Nothing Good Will Come of It
691–694 of 694 posts
Re: AI Will Be Met with Violence, and Nothing Good Will Come of It
#692They say cars replaced carriages but created drivers, so no net job loss. They say AI will do the same—destroy some jobs, create others. But bro, the automobile wiped out 95% of the world's horses. And this time, what AI is replacing is humans.
...are you suggesting that horses would prefer to endure the conditions under which they built much of the modern world on their backs? I hate cars way more than I hate AI, but relieving horses of the burden which they carried and the gruesome lives they lived... that's not one of my objections. If AI can do for humans what cars did for horses (but without the flooding cities with traffic violence part), I'll feel ju…
Re: AI Will Be Met with Violence, and Nothing Good Will Come of It
#693Maybe it’s my own lived experience coloring my perspective, but man the author feels like a centrist sitting upon an imagined moral high ground. “Violence is bad but inevitable” is the kind of milquetoast non-committal position one takes when they have nothing else to contribute to the discussion at hand. My own take goes that one step further, as I said in a prior comment rebutting Altman’s whinging blog post: > You…
I disagree only in that there is one last married recourse, which we are fast running out of time to implement, but which is indeed non-violent and would have the effect of robbing the people driving this Thanatosian engine of their fuel. And it is this: Bank run, general strike. And it's up to the professional class (and their direct servicers/reports) to implement it. They're the only ones with both the power and i…