Live data from Hacker News

In 2024, please switch to Firefox

roytanck.com

691–700 of 850 posts

Re: In 2024, please switch to Firefox

#692
post #461

Earlier quoted context omitted.

My deshittification suite is NextDNS (Pi-hole as a service), 1Blocker (ad blocker, bought pre-subscription model), Rekt (block bags, redirect AMP), and Vinegar (replaces YouTube player). I use UBO on Chrome and find the above experience comparable.

> 1Blocker (ad blocker, bought pre-subscription model) Worth noting they continue to have a lifetime plan.

Thank you! It is great, and I now feel comfortable recommending it again.

Re: In 2024, please switch to Firefox

#694
post #618

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Then we can compare brave and firefox in terms of speed. I don’t see any noticeable performance difference (I use both on linux and macos)

Then ... maybe have a look at some numbers: https://www.phoronix.com/news/Firefox-Chrome-109-Benchmarks And sadly it can be worse, with my quite complex app, that I absolutely did not tailor for chrome, but gone out of my way to also support FF - the result is that chrome is just 3x faster.

Thank you, never looked at these. The benchmarks show a big margin, but still, I use both daily and do not notice such a gap

Re: In 2024, please switch to Firefox

#695

Anyone else remember Mitchell Baker (Firefox CEO) calling for more than deplatforming? https://blog.mozilla.org/en/mozilla/we-need-more-than-deplat...

Yep, one of the many reasons I won't support the organization. At least capitalist/for-profit organizations are honest about who they are.

Yeah, when I think of "honest" I think of Google...

Granted, that statement by Mozilla left a sour taste in my mouth. I'd like my browser vendor to be content-neutral. I'll decide if something is bad or not for myself.

Re: In 2024, please switch to Firefox

#697

I actually finally just switched to Chrome (I'm a long time Firefox user, all the way back to when it was called Firebird), because of this issue: https://connect.mozilla.org/t5/discussions/microsoft-defende... Windows Defender flags things in the Firefox cache as a Trojan. It probably isn't, and it could also have something to do with uBlock Origin, but until that is resolved (I'm keeping an eye on the above link) I…

i haven't seen that at all. Perhaps a refresh, clean install after deleting the hidden app folders in home?

I haven't done a re-install, but deleting the cache folder alone doesn't make it go away. Starting Firefox re-creates the folder obviously, and Defender gets triggered again.

Re: In 2024, please switch to Firefox

#698
Why are Mac users forgetting the hen laying the golden egg aka Safari. It has impressive performance on Mac OS. I just ran browserbench and Chrome and gang do not even come close to the performance. There are enough Mac OS deployed out there to make a dent in the Chrome monopoly.

Re: In 2024, please switch to Firefox

#699

I'm an on-and-off Firefox user, and I always find these pleas kind of lame. It's a good enough browser, but the other arguments aren't very convincing. It's a contradiction to claim Firefox is better at privacy when Mozilla makes most of its money by funneling people to Google's spyware network. Not only is it anti-privacy, the other side effects include things like only blocking "bad" trackers, not including ad-bloc…

> And the browser monopoly argument isn't that strong either. We have Chromium from Google, and Mozilla Firefox funded by Google. Look at DRM video - it made no difference. I agree. The sooner Firefox goes away, the sooner people stop pretending we don't have a duopoly between Chrome and Safari already. From then, people need to work for Chromium improvements, perhaps consolidate in one good "ungoogled" fork. And let…

I don't necessarily want Firefox to go away, but as it stands right now it's not independent from Google and can't take a hard stance on privacy or web standards.

Re: In 2024, please switch to Firefox

#700

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> ctrl-l ctrl-c ctrl-shift-p ctrl-v enter FTFY EDIT: Mine was wrong too. Thanks to ipython for the correction.

Wouldn’t it be Ctrl-v not ctrl-p? To paste instead of print a blank page?

Yep! My mistake, nice catch.
Post reply on HN