691–700 of 809 posts
SEO crap ruined search, but you can still search. Asking a chatbot is going to be promoted until you won't have any way to source the answers, and we'll rely on a big corporation's version of reality on the basis of Trust Me Bro. Great timeline, excellent job.
SEO crap ruined search, but you can still search. Asking a chatbot is going to be promoted until you won't have any way to source the answers, and we'll rely on a big corporation's version of reality on the basis of Trust Me Bro. Great timeline, excellent job.
But people were able to find stuff before the advent of search engines on the internet. Why can't that still work? And if you believe search engines are useful, you would continue to use them (may be from google, if bing decides to remove themselves). Just because bing might change into a question-answer style engine, doesn't mean you must use them. And if it turns out to be _better_, well, that's progress.
You really couldn't.
SEO crap ruined search, but you can still search. Asking a chatbot is going to be promoted until you won't have any way to source the answers, and we'll rely on a big corporation's version of reality on the basis of Trust Me Bro. Great timeline, excellent job.
[flagged]
We saw Jacinda Ardern tell NZ that the govt was the single source of truth and not to trust anything else. That was quite disturbing, especially when they moved to cover up the (few) deaths from the vaccine.
Also in NZ there is a organisation called The Disinformation Project, who received govt grants via "NZ on Air", who ironically spread disinformation themselves when they're not busy attacking people exercising their right to protest.
SEO crap ruined search, but you can still search. Asking a chatbot is going to be promoted until you won't have any way to source the answers, and we'll rely on a big corporation's version of reality on the basis of Trust Me Bro. Great timeline, excellent job.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
But people were able to find stuff before the advent of search engines on the internet. Why can't that still work? And if you believe search engines are useful, you would continue to use them (may be from google, if bing decides to remove themselves). Just because bing might change into a question-answer style engine, doesn't mean you must use them. And if it turns out to be _better_, well, that's progress.
I don't consider myself a drooling idiot, but I started using the Internet maybe a couple years after Google started existing, so I don't remember how to find stuff pre-search engine. I rather doubt the generations that came after would have the knowledge or the inclination. The generations that came after experienced computers that had become far more "user friendly", walled gardens, and a salvo of psychological man…
The Edge integration announced today also looks very impressive. I chuckled at the thought that MS is probably about to make a daily Edge user out of me and a lot of other people, but of course Edge is Chrome under the hood now. So Google beat MS to browser market dominance, and now MS is using their browser as a platform to go after Google's core business. Neat. I think this tech is going to be transformative for ev…
>of course Edge is Chrome under the hood Embrace, Extend. That's the beauty of open source, right? If development and innovation slows, somebody can fork.
The Edge integration announced today also looks very impressive. I chuckled at the thought that MS is probably about to make a daily Edge user out of me and a lot of other people, but of course Edge is Chrome under the hood now. So Google beat MS to browser market dominance, and now MS is using their browser as a platform to go after Google's core business. Neat. I think this tech is going to be transformative for ev…
So far GPT has been trained with data generated by humans. Curious how the quality of it's output will change once it gets fed with AI generated data.