Earlier quoted context omitted.
The W4 form should be sufficient (since it's used to determine the credit, if any, you receive per paycheck). You shouldn't need to file a 1040. Your employer would file the W-2 form which would allow the government to determine your income for the purposes of the amount of credit you receive per paycheck.
So any income other than as a W-2 employee doesn't count influence your credit? This includes capital gains, rent collected from tenants, AdSense revenue. The right way to handle this stuff is not immediately obvious to me.
Congress Is About to Ban the US Government from Offering Free Online Tax Filing
691–700 of 717 posts
Re: Congress Is About to Ban the US Government from Offering Free Online Tax Filing
#692NPR's Planet Money just re-ran an episode[1] related to this. In 2005, California ran a pilot program where they sent simple, pre-filled tax forms[2] to a sample of the population. 98% of people liked them and would use them again. In 2006 it would have become standard for California, but failed in the legislature by a single vote. Opposition was from two factions: lobbying by Intuit, and Grover Norquist claiming tha…
I will say, vote with your dollars. If you don't like Intuit's lobbying, please don't feed the beast and use their services.
That’s how we got to this situation in the first place.
Re: Congress Is About to Ban the US Government from Offering Free Online Tax Filing
#693Re: Congress Is About to Ban the US Government from Offering Free Online Tax Filing
#694Earlier quoted context omitted.
I might be getting old, but more and more I see “vote with your XXXXX” to be the litmus test for situations there is no decent solution left anymore. It’s not even an advice in the end, just a reminder the customer lost the battle, and the only alternative is to leave the field with what’s left on their posession to go roam the desert.
Where government is concerned, you’re completely correct. However, voting with your dollars does work well for markets, e.g. grocery stores and the like.
"Voting with your dollars" is a fools argument designed to impart the feeling that the reader somehow has sway over a monopoly
Re: Congress Is About to Ban the US Government from Offering Free Online Tax Filing
#695Earlier quoted context omitted.
Where government is concerned, you’re completely correct. However, voting with your dollars does work well for markets, e.g. grocery stores and the like.
Virtually all markets lead to an equilibrium of very few businesses that try their hardest not to compete where possible "Voting with your dollars" is a fools argument designed to impart the feeling that the reader somehow has sway over a monopoly
Pretty sure there's always an option. Nihilism is the worst one.
Re: Congress Is About to Ban the US Government from Offering Free Online Tax Filing
#696Earlier quoted context omitted.
The difference is that you know whether you have all your required information. The IRS doesn’t know until it has everything . Example: your only bank sends your 1099-DIV on February 15, so you file your return. You know that no other bank is going to send you a 1099-DIV because you don’t have any other bank accounts. The IRS doesn’t know this. The IRS only knows that you didn’t get any other 1099-DIVs after they’ve…
"The difference is that you know whether you have all your required information." I don't.
Re: Congress Is About to Ban the US Government from Offering Free Online Tax Filing
#697Earlier quoted context omitted.
The difference is that you know whether you have all your required information. The IRS doesn’t know until it has everything . Example: your only bank sends your 1099-DIV on February 15, so you file your return. You know that no other bank is going to send you a 1099-DIV because you don’t have any other bank accounts. The IRS doesn’t know this. The IRS only knows that you didn’t get any other 1099-DIVs after they’ve…
The IRS could develop a system where they list what information they've received already, and you can then validate that this represents the complete set of expected information and request that they go ahead and process taxes now without waiting. If they then receive more information later that would affect your taxes, they can bill you, or otherwise just go through the same process they would if you filed your taxe…
Re: Congress Is About to Ban the US Government from Offering Free Online Tax Filing
#698Earlier quoted context omitted.
I will say, vote with your dollars. If you don't like Intuit's lobbying, please don't feed the beast and use their services.
I might be getting old, but more and more I see “vote with your XXXXX” to be the litmus test for situations there is no decent solution left anymore. It’s not even an advice in the end, just a reminder the customer lost the battle, and the only alternative is to leave the field with what’s left on their posession to go roam the desert.
Re: Congress Is About to Ban the US Government from Offering Free Online Tax Filing
#699Earlier quoted context omitted.
Which many countries do already. In France, before this year, if you were an employee, you rarely filled a tax form, you just validated a prefilled one, usually with one click on the internet. Now it's just taken every month from your salary, and you get a chance to correct it once a year.
Many countries do this, because in those countries, the government actually represents the interests of people. If there was ever a clear case of the US government putting the needs of businesses before the needs of the people, it's this: keep taxes as complex as possible in order to create business opportunities to sell products to make it easier again. It's a complete bullshit business that shouldn't be necessary a…
But I agree the french gov is less into business.
Re: Congress Is About to Ban the US Government from Offering Free Online Tax Filing
#700Earlier quoted context omitted.
Is not sleazy. They have two systems but no export from one to the other and why should they? It's free. You build it for free.
No. It really is sleazy. I'm talking about a situation where the user is paying for the H&R service. This is a paying customer, not a free user. This user then adds a tax pro review service but decides later that they do not want that add-on service. But now the user cannot remove that added-on service on the H&R website. The user calls in to an automated phone line which tells the user that, in order to downgrade, t…
Don't attribute to maliciousness what can be attributed to incompetence.