Live data from Hacker News

Claude Sonnet 4.5

anthropic.com

681–690 of 819 posts

Re: Claude Sonnet 4.5

#681

I need to try Claude - haven't gotten to it. I use AI for different things, though, including proofreading posts on political topics. I have run into situations where ChatGPT just freezes and refuses. Example: discussing the recent rape case involving a 12-year-old in Austria. I assume its guardrails detect "sex + kid" and give a hard "no" regardless of the actual context or content. That is unacceptable. That's like…

> It's a tool, it doesn't get to make that choice. It's a service , not a tool. If you want a tool, run some local LLM.

Unfortunately, they generally have the same problem because of their models.

Re: Claude Sonnet 4.5

#682
post #204

I had access to a preview over the weekend, I published some notes here: https://simonwillison.net/2025/Sep/29/claude-sonnet-4-5/ It's very good - I think probably a tiny bit better than GPT-5-Codex, based on vibes more than a comprehensive comparison (there are plenty of benchmarks out there that attempt to be more methodical than vibes). It particularly shines when you try it on https://claude.ai/ using its brand n…

> I told it to Give me a zip file of everything you have done so far—you can explore the contents of the file it made me in this Gist. For those who don't have time to dig into the gist, did it work and do a good job? I assume yes to at least nominally working or you would have mentioned that, but any other thoughts on the solution it produced?

Had a similar issue - wanted to get all the files from the response without too much work, so I opened a new tab and vibe coded this in about 4 minutes. Tested it on exactly 1 case: a previous Sonnet 4.5 response, and worked well.

https://github.com/ethanpil/claude-files-creator

Re: Claude Sonnet 4.5

#683

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't, I need someone telling me the flaws of my ideas, not to confirm them for the sake of it.

You raise an excellent point but affirming bad ideas is probably not anyone's idea of "light flattery".

You raise a not so excellent point.

It might not anyone's idea of "light flattery", but it's certainly is what most LLMs do, which is the main point of the conversation and your comment seems to be derailing it.

Re: Claude Sonnet 4.5

#684

I need to try Claude - haven't gotten to it. I use AI for different things, though, including proofreading posts on political topics. I have run into situations where ChatGPT just freezes and refuses. Example: discussing the recent rape case involving a 12-year-old in Austria. I assume its guardrails detect "sex + kid" and give a hard "no" regardless of the actual context or content. That is unacceptable. That's like…

Sometimes you do need censored, e.g. website chatbots or anything run in an office setting. NSFW things just simply can't slip out of those. And it might be a way to optimize the model to simply fence those things out.

But it is very limiting and adds many arbitrary landmines of obscure political correctness based no doubt on some perverse incoherent totalitarian list of allowed topics.

Re: Claude Sonnet 4.5

#685
post #672

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I thought the percentage was how many problems it successfully solved

Technically correct, but not helpful nor actionable.

It was actually very helpful as it answered my question about what the benchmark numbers are. It wasn't a request for advice, but I'm merely looking to understand the article, which doesn't really elaborate on what they are presenting; either assuming an audience that is very familiar with these benchmarks prior, or so dazzled by number going up they forget to ask what number is.

Re: Claude Sonnet 4.5

#686
post #69

I’m always fascinated by the fine-tuning of LLM personalities. Might we finally get less of the reflexive “You’re absolutely right” with this one? Maybe we’re entering the Emo Claude era. Per the system card: In 250k real conversations, Claude Sonnet 4.5 expressed happiness about half as often as Claude 4, though distress remained steady.

Here I am, brain the size of a planet...

Re: Claude Sonnet 4.5

#687

Claude doesn't know how to calculate realistic minimum voltages for solar arrays w/MPPT chargers. ChatGPT does. Prompt: "Can I use two strings of four Phono Solar PS440M8GFH solar panels with a EG4 12kPV Hybrid Inverter? I want to make sure that there will not be an issue any time of year. New York upstate." Claude 4.5: Returns within a few seconds. Does not find the PV panel specs, so it asks me if I want it to sear…

This HN post is about claude 4.5 and you come here speaking about how "claude" does not give you satisfactory answer when, most likely, you didn't even try claude 4.5 in the first place.

Claude 4.5 after a few web searches and running a couple python scripts for analysis:

Yes, your configuration should work!

Based on my analysis, two strings of four Phono Solar PS440M8GFH panels will be compatible with the EG4 12kPV inverter for upstate New York conditions.

Key Findings:

Voltage Safety:

Cold weather maximum (-25°C/-13°F): 182V - well below the 600V limit (only 30% of maximum)

Standard operating voltage: 128V - comfortably within the 120-500V MPPT range

Hot weather minimum (40°C/104°F panel temp): 121V - just above the 120V MPPT minimum

Current:

Operating current: ~13.8A per string - well within the 25A MPPT limit (55% of capacity) Total System:

8 panels × 440W = 3,520W (3.5kW) - well below the 12kW inverter rating

Important Considerations:

Hot weather margin is tight: At extreme hot temperatures, the voltage drops to about 121V, which is only 1V above the MPPT minimum. This means:

The system will work, but efficiency might be slightly reduced on the hottest days The MPPT controller should still track power effectively

More robust alternative: If you want more safety margin, consider 5 panels per string instead:

Cold: 228V (still safe)

Hot: 151V (much better margin above 120V minimum)

Total: 10 panels = 4.4kW

Wire each string to a separate MPPT on the EG4 12kPV (it has 2 MPPTs), which is perfect for your 2-string configuration.

Bottom Line:

Your planned configuration of 2 strings × 4 panels will work year-round in upstate New York without safety issues. The system is conservatively sized and should perform well!

Re: Claude Sonnet 4.5

#688
post #199

I am a paying subscriber to Gemini, Claude and OpenAI. I don't know if it's me, but over the last few weeks I've got to the conclusion ChatGPT is very strongly leading the race. Every answer it gives me is better - it's more concise and more informative. I look forward to testing this further, but out of the few runs I just did after reading about this - it isn't looking much better

What about Grok, are they catching up?

There is also code-supernova, which is in-preview improved version of grok-code-fast-1. 1M context window. It's useful, but I'm still not sure how much better than grok-code-fast-1. You can get free access to it via a few providers, e.g. opencode.

Re: Claude Sonnet 4.5

#690

I just ran this through a simple change I’ve asked Sonnet 4 and Opus 4.1, and it fails too. It’s a simple substitution request where I provide a Lint error that suggests the correct change. All the models fail. I could ask someone with no development experience to do this change and they could. I worry everyone is chasing benchmarks to the detriment of general performance. Or the next token weight for the incorrect c…

> I worry everyone is chasing benchmarks to the detriment of general performance. I’m not sure this is entirely what you’re driving at, but the example I always think of in my head is “I want an AI agent that will scan through my 20 to 30,000 photos, remove all the duplicates, then organize them all in some coherent fashion.” that’s the kind of service I need right now, and it feels like something AI should be able t…

I made this as a first step in the process of organizing large amounts of images. Once you have the keywords and descriptions in the metadata, it should be possible to have a more powerful text only LLM come up with an organizing scheme and enact it by giving it file or scripting access via MCP. Thanks for reminding me that I need to work on that step now since local LLMs are powerful enough.

* https://github.com/jabberjabberjabber/ImageIndexer

Post reply on HN