Live data from Hacker News

Colorado scrambles to change voting-system passwords after accidental leak

arstechnica.com

681–682 of 682 posts

Re: Colorado scrambles to change voting-system passwords after accidental leak

#681

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I am open to the idea that it is possible , but many things are possible. I'm asking you to share information that supports your assertion. You still haven't done so. It appears you're dodging the question. Do you have documented examples or data, or not?

I didn't ask if it's possible. I asked whether you think it happens. I suspect you can't answer that question directly because the answer is self-evident and destructive to your case. Anyway, here are a few anecdotes: https://restlessnetwork.com/domestic-abuse-is-a-voter-suppre... Inb4 "those are anecdotes!" And then subsequent refusal to answer the point blank question of whether you believe it happens or not, for a…

> I didn't ask if it's possible. I asked whether you think it happens.

I would not make an assertion either for or against it in the absence of data. I would not put forth such a hypothesis without at least anecdotal indicators of a problem. I appreciate you linking to something; even anecdotes help to paint a picture for potentially additional research/analysis, so thanks for that. Now, in response to the linked anecdotes:

The author mentions emotional gaslighting in 2009 and in 2017. There's no indication that she or the other woman was at risk of physical abuse (which is what you suggested was the issue) in either case.

So I would agree with and endorse the statement "Some men use emotional abuse and gaslighting to control how their spouses vote" but still disagree with the extreme position of "women are at risk of being beaten to death for their voting positions" as that remains unsupported hysteria.

This is the most charitable take I can make from your link. There's some real nuggets sprinkled in her writing which lead me to paint her as a completely unreliable narrator and discount/disregard anything she says. If she's foolish enough to stay in a relationship with a delinquent, drug-abusing, alcoholic emotional abuser....hey, that was her choice, and her competency as a responsible adult is questionable at best. If one of my junior male Marines walked came to me with the same sob story (and I've had Marines with bizarre relationship problems before), he'd get a pretty stern talking-to, some life advice...and we'd probably be questioning his decision-making and level of responsibility he can handle moving forward.

"Life is hard....it's even harder when you're stupid."

Re: Colorado scrambles to change voting-system passwords after accidental leak

#682
post #616

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That doesn't sound like it secures anything. I can't verify that my prime number is unique (I vote for A. There is already a vote for A at 3. The machine logs a vote for B at 5 and reports to me my number is 3). So it'd be a scheme where nothing can be proved to me that I didn't already know. I still have to trust all the same middlemen, and I don't gain any knowledge about the integrity of an election.

> If everyone got a unique prime number

That is an unreasonable assumption, there isn't a secure way to issue everyone with a guaranteed unique prime. And even if there was, what is this system supposed to be doing? It doesn't secure anything and it doesn't enable any new knowledge that wasn't already available by just signing ballots with your name (which is a bad idea, so by comparison we might expect that this prime scheme is also a bad idea). Are you sure that is an interesting thread to pull? It doesn't look at all promising to me.
Post reply on HN