Earlier quoted context omitted.
> What's your SLA with them? Sorry what? You've just witnessed almost the entire internet break because of a catastrophic cascading outage that affected lots of huge companies, since third party services used and trusted Fastly. Shopify stores couldn't accept payments on their websites, Coinbase Retail/Pro transactions and trading apps failed to load, and delivery apps stopped loading all of a sudden. These are just…
> I don't care if everything fails sometimes You can say you don't care for reality, but it's not going to help you have better systems. > There are sites that should NOT go down Then they surely either engineered their system to not 100% rely on Fastly or negotiated appropriate terms with Fastly (Or decided Fastly going down was an acceptable business risk, which it is for nearly everybody). Everything else would be…
No where in my sentence I said this so quit the strawman argument.
I know a client using a service that has 100% uptime for the year, that also relies on huge clients, I don't understand why Fastly can't guarantee at the very least and a failover system to counteract this, but clearly didn't work. (or even existed)
> (Or decided Fastly going down was an acceptable business risk, which it is for nearly everybody).
Then why did this cascade to almost everybody even indirectly? Surely their advertised failover system would have prevented this from prolonging further but lasted longer than it should have.
I don't think a store, exchange or trading desk not accepting payments from people for an hour is acceptable at all.