Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Nobody cares

grantslatton.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

671–680 of 1001 posts

Re: Nobody cares

#671

Post by thimabi »

bruce511 wrote: post #512
matthewdgreen wrote: post #459

Earlier quoted context omitted.

One of the things that’s surprising about traveling to Europe and Japan is that this revenue maximizing business strategy isn’t as prevalent. You don’t see the same upsells everywhere and tipping culture is also mostly non-existent. Many US businesses managed to behave in a manner that was vastly less extractive to their customers for most of the last century as well. It really is possible to care about the quality o…

It's exactly harder but when customers prioritize price above everything it's hard to succeed if you offer better, but charge more. The hard truth is that American consumers care only about price, and so businesses optimize for that (or go under). Which means they lean into other sources of revenue, or ways to reduce costs. Elsewhere people care about value more than price, and are willing to spend more to get more.…

Do you think it is possible for a society to switch from emphasizing price to emphasizing value? If so, how do you think such a change would take place?

Re: Nobody cares

#672

Post by Dansvidania »

> You might think "something something incentive systems". No. At my big tech job I had the pleasure of interviewing a few programmers who worked for a large healthcare company that engages in regulatory capture. Let me assure you: They. Do. Not Care.

How does the second part of this paragraph disprove "something something incentive systems" ?

I am sincerely curious, as I can't make the connection myself, and of course "something something incentive systems" would be exactly my argument.

Re: Nobody cares

#673

Post by NikkiA »

maayank wrote: post #664
tmnvdb wrote: post #663

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Take a photo

Implies no white balance shenanigans

A sheet of paper will generally manage ok for white balance calibration. A 3 tone grey card would be better, but a single, simple white will suffice

Re: Nobody cares

#674

Post by nicce »

tqi wrote: post #425

Its ironic, because this dude doesn't seem to care enough to even the slightest bit of research to understand why any of these problems he highlights are the way they are, and lazily attributes everything to OTHER people not caring. LEDs last longer, are more energy efficient, and also reduce light pollution because they are more directional[1]. Took me 30 seconds to google. There are enormous design standards for de…

I would even argue that the current design of the bike line is better than the one suggested by the author.

It forces the biker to slow down and reduces the collision risks with others in the line.

It is selfish to think only about the biker coming from the hill. The biker that thinks it is okay to drive 20mph in that situation.

Re: Nobody cares

#675

Post by NikkiA »

josephcsible wrote: post #478
matthewdgreen wrote: post #455

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Here in Baltimore the city seems to have purchased a huge batch of defective LEDs that are actually purple. It’s disturbing when you encounter one.

Nitpick: "are actually purple" makes it sound like they came out of the factory purple, but they're actually changing from white to purple over time as the phosphor coating fails.

They'll be near-UV LEDs with a phosphor to produce white, high efficiency, low cost, but garbage long term.

Re: Nobody cares

#676

Post by magicalhippo »

veltas wrote: post #474
tqi wrote: post #425

Its ironic, because this dude doesn't seem to care enough to even the slightest bit of research to understand why any of these problems he highlights are the way they are, and lazily attributes everything to OTHER people not caring. LEDs last longer, are more energy efficient, and also reduce light pollution because they are more directional[1]. Took me 30 seconds to google. There are enormous design standards for de…

I don't understand how they're safer, because locally they've installed a few and they're already dying, and dying by strobing on and off at about 1Hz, which makes it quite hard to drive through. They're so bright that this failure mode is like a disco strobe light. This failure is so severe that regardless of how it might be elsewhere, to me it seems like the people who decided to use these LED lights and continue t…

The problem is almost never the LEDs themselves, but the power supply.

Sure, the actual LEDs might have a 50000 hour lifetime, but the crappy power supply they got from the lowest bidder and packaged with woefully inadequate thermal dissipation dies after a tiny fraction of that.

Re: Nobody cares

#677

Post by 4ndrewl »

tqi wrote: post #425

Its ironic, because this dude doesn't seem to care enough to even the slightest bit of research to understand why any of these problems he highlights are the way they are, and lazily attributes everything to OTHER people not caring. LEDs last longer, are more energy efficient, and also reduce light pollution because they are more directional[1]. Took me 30 seconds to google. There are enormous design standards for de…

He does not care

Re: Nobody cares

#679

Post by [deleted] »

TheOtherHobbes wrote: post #650
gizmo wrote: post #614

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Of course there are "reasonable justifications" for the shitty status quo, but that's kind of the point. Things are shitty for reasons but not for good reasons. The author points to Japan to illustrate that you do get measurably better results when people habitually try to do good work. We're not actually doomed to have crappy furniture, flimsy and buggy appliances, byzantine legal codes, ugly architecture, and hosti…

Cheaper lighting costs across an entire city are a very good reason. "Ugly architecture" is subjective. A lot of architects care very much, but they follow the academic line and lack the imagination and empathy to understand why elements of that aesthetic are unpopular and impractical - a completely different problem, even if it causes related outcomes. Bugs are easy to write and hard to fix. MBA culture as a whole i…

[deleted]

Re: Nobody cares

#680

Post by ipython »

gs17 wrote: post #444
ipython wrote: post #355

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Actually, in a way this is already true. If you consent to installing their mobile app (which includes god knows what kind of analytics), you are rewarded with at least 20% off all McDonald’s food list prices. So you can pay for “McDonald’s without analytics” by paying list prices in cash at the register. Now, if there was an option when booking a flight to pick a fare class not subjected to the stupid branded credit…

> So you can pay for “McDonald’s without analytics” by paying list prices in cash at the register. I didn't know they took orders at the register still. I've only been in once (last year) in the past 20 years, but they seemed to insist on kiosk-only. Not sure if the drive-thru is like that too.

You still pay the unsubsidized full menu price at the kiosk or drive through. I believe you can order at the kiosk and not use a card (pay cash at register)
Post reply on HN