Earlier quoted context omitted.
>but pretty much all of them agree with the idea that everyone should be entitled to basic decency. This is begging the question. Disagreement over what "basic decency" means is the heart of the LGBTIAP+ debate, just like disagreement over when life begins and what that means is at the heart of the abortion issue. Some think "basic decency" means transitioning schoolchildren behind their parents' backs, providing the…
> Disagreement over what "basic decency" means is the heart of the LGBTIAP+ debate, Okay, let's put it another way. Pretty much all of them agreed with me about the entitlement to basic decency. From this, I conclude that my views about basic decency probably aren't all that controversial, after all. This disagreement exists online, and in the press. I haven't seen it in the real world. If "the heart of the […] debat…
https://nypost.com/2022/10/24/biden-calls-curbs-on-treatment...
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/biden-transgender-youth-state...
I have family and friends in K-12 education. If you question LGBTQIAP+ or fail to affirm a kids' gender self-identification, you are out of a job. Wesley Yang has covered this topic extensively, and is a good one to follow on Twitter:
https://wesleyyang.substack.com/p/i-needed-love-i-needed-sup...
https://wesleyyang.substack.com/p/i-felt-like-she-was-settin...
https://wesleyyang.substack.com/p/the-dangerous-overreach-of...
>I currently lean towards the "radical autonomy" end of the spectrum, in case you haven't picked up on that
I believe you. That approach endangers children, has no scientific basis, and will be stopped in the courts. Kids do not have the capacity to make permanent, life-altering decisions about fertility or sexuality. They do not and cannot understand the implications and consequences of their actions. Responsible adults must safeguard them into adulthood.