And suddenly, unexplainably my bill would skyrocket?
Claude Code refuses requests or charges extra if your commits mention "OpenClaw"
661–670 of 760 posts
Re: Claude Code refuses requests or charges extra if your commits mention "OpenClaw"
#662Re: Claude Code refuses requests or charges extra if your commits mention "OpenClaw"
#663Earlier quoted context omitted.
Pretty wild to say that the company with one of the best models (arguably the best) is a bunch of idiots.
> Pretty wild to say that the company with one of the best models (arguably the best) is a bunch of idiots. It would be pretty wild if they didn't considering all the money thrown at them! You're looking at one of the largest investments business (as a collective) has ever made. They had better be one of the forerunners in the space :-/
Re: Claude Code refuses requests or charges extra if your commits mention "OpenClaw"
#664Earlier quoted context omitted.
What kind of work are you applying Opus and other LLMs to? I'm quite curious to understand how other people are using these tools. At the moment neither Opus nor any open weights models seem to be capable of doing complex work, and for less complex work the additional cost of Opus hasn't been worthwhile. This is for reasonably math-heavy computer vision applications. What LLMs have been useful for is identifying forg…
My current job has me overseeing a few teams of engineers working on ~10+ y/o legacy software systems that have not been especially well maintained. As an example, one team had a completely broken CI pipeline due to numerous flaky tests. They had configured the CI pipeline to rerun tests multiple times and still the master branch had like.. a 40% pass rate. Super ugly, but the suite took ~40 minutes to run and they w…
Re: Claude Code refuses requests or charges extra if your commits mention "OpenClaw"
#665So if you add some special string to the docs, it stops Claude ?
Re: Claude Code refuses requests or charges extra if your commits mention "OpenClaw"
#666Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Pretty wild to say that the company with one of the best models (arguably the best) is a bunch of idiots. It would be pretty wild if they didn't considering all the money thrown at them! You're looking at one of the largest investments business (as a collective) has ever made. They had better be one of the forerunners in the space :-/
And you think with all of this money they are employing idiots?
Re: Claude Code refuses requests or charges extra if your commits mention "OpenClaw"
#667Earlier quoted context omitted.
Pretty wild to say that the company with one of the best models (arguably the best) is a bunch of idiots.
Even idiots can succeed if you uncritically funnel them hundreds of billions of dollars.
Re: Claude Code refuses requests or charges extra if your commits mention "OpenClaw"
#668Earlier quoted context omitted.
I used the term "smuggling" in the casual sense of hiding something. I have edited it to "place such identifiers surreptitiously" to avoid making whatever implication appears to have been taken.
In the real world, leaving booby traps out that can harm others including the innocent are a liability and regularly a crime in itself. I wonder how long these sorts of games will play before the law applies itself.
If tomorrow Antropic decide to charge you extra if you interact with someone who talked badly about them, I'm still in my right to talk shit about them.
Re: Claude Code refuses requests or charges extra if your commits mention "OpenClaw"
#669Re: Claude Code refuses requests or charges extra if your commits mention "OpenClaw"
#670Earlier quoted context omitted.
I strongly dislike all of these companies (and the people who run them), and I don't love LLMs in general, although I use them every day because they are useful for my job. But the simple fact is, if you're paying $20/mo and using $200/mo of tokens, that is not going to last forever. The only way to make it last a bit longer for the people with relatively sane usage patterns is to try and stop people absolutely takin…
That's not true, you're using RIAA-style wishful accounting here. If the company is willing to sell me $200 worth of tokens for $20, that's still worth only $20 to me.