Live data from Hacker News

Joe Biden stands down as Democratic candidate

twitter.com

661–670 of 1001 posts

Re: Joe Biden stands down as Democratic candidate

#661

Earlier quoted context omitted.

He can do president duties, while the candidate they choose go around collecting votes.

That's the thing. If he's unfit to serve 6 months from now, then how is he fit to serve now? He didn't endorse Kamala in his letter. We'll see what comes out of the spin cycle this week. e: looks like Biden endorsed Kamala according to other publications

Unfit to run a campaign, travel like mad, and get over an illness. An extended lame duck session now.

Re: Joe Biden stands down as Democratic candidate

#662

Not going to happen, but I wonder how a mixed party ticket would do. Kamala (or whoever) + Mitt Romney as VP ? Has it ever been done? Would it work to attract the center/swing vote, or more likely to be a negative?

> Has it ever been done?

Yes Lincoln’s re-election was a unity ticket that included Lincoln (Republican) and Johnson (pro-war Democrat)

Re: Joe Biden stands down as Democratic candidate

#663

Putting politics aside … Why don’t they have an age limit on the president (or any elected office)? E.g., you must be younger than the average life expectancy (currently men: 73yo / female: 79) - while in office. https://www.ssa.gov/oact/STATS/table4c6.html

Because old people vote.

Hey, I resemble that remark! (Even if I am younger than Biden or Trump.)

But all seriousness aside, what makes you think that matters? I'm not going to vote for someone because they're old, in fact to some extent the opposite--I'd rather have a 50 or so year old as president. Are there polls that say old people vote for old people just because they're old?

Re: Joe Biden stands down as Democratic candidate

#664

Putting politics aside … Why don’t they have an age limit on the president (or any elected office)? E.g., you must be younger than the average life expectancy (currently men: 73yo / female: 79) - while in office. https://www.ssa.gov/oact/STATS/table4c6.html

FTR: This IS politics. This sort of conversation about public policy is what politics should be.

I always recommend folks read George Washington's farewell address and it's discussion of political parties.

Re: Joe Biden stands down as Democratic candidate

#665
post #536

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There is a lower limit but not an upper limit. Who knows how old we can be in the future, there are coherent smart people over 80 today. But hey, it’s a democracy and if you want to change it you can try…!

Agree that there are plenty of coherent smart people but you also have to think about the workload, my dad is in his 80s and is perfectly sharp on any issues you care to discuss but he also stays in bed until after 9 and enjoys a few naps during the day.

As I said in a post above, I resemble that remark--at least sleeping in, once in a while a nap. But I tend to stay awake until close to midnight. (I'm also not in my 80s, at least not yet--just hoping to get there.)

Re: Joe Biden stands down as Democratic candidate

#666
post #603

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Airline pilots have a legally mandated retirement age of 65. Running the country seems like it's at least as mission-critical as flying a plane.

Air traffic controller here: we have a mandatory requirement age of 56.

Why on earth does anyone actually go into that career?

Re: Joe Biden stands down as Democratic candidate

#667

Putting politics aside … Why don’t they have an age limit on the president (or any elected office)? E.g., you must be younger than the average life expectancy (currently men: 73yo / female: 79) - while in office. https://www.ssa.gov/oact/STATS/table4c6.html

Putting politics aside? Ironic that the link you gave is a .gov site. So that would turn "life expectancy" into something political, and lobbyist would all over it.

Seems like an alignment of incentives, if you want to stay in power you have to make your population live longer.

Re: Joe Biden stands down as Democratic candidate

#670

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I have a "radical" idea: why not actually let the constituency of this party make the choice.

It's barely been a few hours yet I've seen this idea making the rounds. Seems manufactured.

The events leading up to it are far older than a few hours, giving people plenty of time to run different scenarios in their minds.
Post reply on HN