Live data from Hacker News

The EU moves to kill infinite scrolling

politico.eu

651–660 of 979 posts

Re: The EU moves to kill infinite scrolling

#651
post #562

They must rule against chess also then. It's clearly addictive design, harming the minds of innocent kids. Absurd

Chess is healthy you get to go outside and meet people to play with, engage in your local club. Some online platforms make the thing addictive.

most people play online tho

Re: The EU moves to kill infinite scrolling

#653
post #422

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There are many Mastodon servers run by ordinary people simply because they want to. And before the shit-show the internet has become, there were many forums and IRC channels, absolutely free, and with 0 ads.

Very low traction on these. Let me know when there’s something that people actually use in tens or hundreds of millions and random people are just providing the infrastructure out of pocket and spending all their time on this without expectation.

Forums used to be visited by millions of users.

Hosting millions of users is very cheap (less than 200$ per month).

Re: The EU moves to kill infinite scrolling

#654
The first part sounded good, the "every platform is different, we have to decide everything case-by-case" and the specific focus on TikTok less so IMO.

Keep in mind that in Europe, TikTok is still run by the original owners with China connections - unlike the new "American TikTok" after the owner change in the US.

The US legislature only seemed to discover its concern about addictive behavior when foreign actors or pro-palestinian content were involved, but had no problem with YouTube or Facebook doing the same stuff.

I seriously hope it's different in the EU but wouldn't bet on it.

Re: The EU moves to kill infinite scrolling

#656

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Let's drop the charade where you pretend you don't know what advertising is. You're smarter than that, and your playing dumb act would be more persuasive if you didn't ask leading questions that clearly show you know the answers. This isn't a good faith argument. I mean are you really asking whether creators embedding "sponsored by" scenes is an ad as if you don't know? C'mon, don't insult your readers with this nons…

OPs comment isn’t a charade, he’s pointing out that it’s a very blurry line. If I receive compensation from company A for a product, and I genuinely like it, is it advertising if I talk about another item on their product line that I bought because of the free item I got? If I run a retail business, and have a better deal with a provider, am I allowed to prioritise their results? If I run an AI SAAS, with a bring you…

>> HN commenters are not legislators

> That doesn’t mean we’re not allowed to have a discussion about it.

I would even go so far as to say that HN commenters are going to be the ones trying to evade/break/find the loopholes in whatever laws the legislators write.

Re: The EU moves to kill infinite scrolling

#657
post #644
post #478

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Promotion of anything at all is advertising, with or without compensation. The word advertising is pretty well defined, and the dictionary definitions don’t usually mention compensation, e.g. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/advertise . An example I’m sure you would consider advertising - consider Google advertising Google Fiber in Google search results, or Facebook advertising business services on Facebook…

Yes, but if we're talking about incentives and "primordial domino tiles" then compensated advertising is what createa the incentives for the whole attention economy and addictive design in the first place. Feel free to keep doing "pro-bono" advertising, but shareholders definitely wouldn't.

That’s my thinking. Follow the money, get rid of the source of money, and the whole thing falls down.

Of course that will not happen as there are way too many interests involved.

Re: The EU moves to kill infinite scrolling

#658

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> gives poor people access to lots of shit that they otherwise wouldn’t have Addiction is a precursor to poverty. If we accept the domino theory of "online advertising -> addictive design" then the fundamental evil becomes clear. Holding people in poverty in order to profit from their time and attention.

But the most valuable ad targets are people with money unless my product specifically targets low-income individuals (pay day lenders, etc).

Which is why a lot of things are moving to "pay w/ ads". Not only do you get paid twice, your ad space is more valuable because you've weeded out the people who can't pay.

Re: The EU moves to kill infinite scrolling

#659

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Advertising = compensating someone to promote a product / company. It’s about the compensation. That makes it advertising. Regular booking.com is fine. Paying booking.com to allow your results to appear higher is not. Regular Google Maps to register your restaurant is fine. Paying Google Maps to promote your restaurant is not. It’s not that hard to implement. Advertising is pretty well defined.

What would YouTube look like? (Genuinely happy to read “like the good old days” as an answer!)

It would be way smaller and with real content, instead of crappy slop (AI or otherwise).

Re: The EU moves to kill infinite scrolling

#660
post #654

The first part sounded good, the "every platform is different, we have to decide everything case-by-case" and the specific focus on TikTok less so IMO. Keep in mind that in Europe, TikTok is still run by the original owners with China connections - unlike the new "American TikTok" after the owner change in the US. The US legislature only seemed to discover its concern about addictive behavior when foreign actors or p…

Why wouldn't you?

The DSA for instance has only been used against to western companies so far (doesn't mean Chinese companies are immune).

Post reply on HN