Live data from Hacker News

We will ban you and ridicule you in public if you waste our time on crap reports

curl.se

651–653 of 653 posts

Re: We will ban you and ridicule you in public if you waste our time on crap reports

#651

- I notice a lot of stuff in github issues all the time - For example, there is this +1 comment pasted like 500 times that I have seen a lot over issues - Cant we have a github regex bot of sorts ^(\W+)?\+(\W+)?1(\W+)?$ that removes all such comments? or let the author of the repo control what kind of regex based stuff to remove? - I know regex kind of sounds old fashioned in the age of LLMs but it is kinda simple to…

Yes you can, and those comments will then say "plus one", which you will add to your regex, and then they will say "++", which you will add to your regex, and then they will say "I agree", which you will add to your regex, and then they will say "me too", ......

+9001 agree, this arms race is doomed.

Re: We will ban you and ridicule you in public if you waste our time on crap reports

#652
post #588

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Then, the people who actually want the fix will bet it back up so the dev is incentivized to fix it!

People who work on making money, tend to have more money and leverage. It’s not an even playing field.

There are bribing and HFT opportunities here too. The fix developer is incentivized to wait until the last possible moment to take the position "the PR addressing the bug will be merged by the date" so that the contract will be the cheapest for them to buy and represent the greatest profit when the PR is opened or merged. What's a savvy speculator on the sidelines to do? After the PR is opened, bribe the project maintainer not to accept the PR by that date so they can turn a sure-thing "Yes" into a huge upset "No." Or watch the developer's github for green shower tiles to see activity in private repos. But the developer can throw up chaff that by scripting bunches of commits in other private repos, or changing the commit dates for the bug fixes to be a year ago. The speculator can monitor the developer's posts in language/topic forums or on social media to get a feel for their progress. If they're really connected, maybe they can see their AI agent/chatbot logs through an insider in one of those companies.

This idea rocks because eventually someone is going to get blackmailed with their affair history over, like, adding native XLSX support to FFMPEG. Can't wait. Financialize everything.

Re: We will ban you and ridicule you in public if you waste our time on crap reports

#653

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It is fine if it is not lying but so often you ask how are you and get the flowers and butterflies response but when you sit 10 min more they start explaining how miserable they are: as a Dutchman, I do tend to ask why they said how great and excellent they were just minutes ago. And no, it is not just something you do out of politeness: if you just canned response to one thing, how do I know you don't have canned re…

It isn’t lying, it is what we consider an appropriate level of sharing. We don’t tend to want to put our burdens on people who may not be interested in hearing it.

After talking to many folks from US I appreciate that. It's like going through the original `SYN ; SYN ACK ; ACK` flow. You are just establishing the conversation, but then the content can start flowing after if there's interest.
Post reply on HN